# P3-S25.1 — INTERRUPTION DIAGNOSIS (Recovery #3) ```text Date : 2026-08-26 Session : P3-S25.1 RECOVERY #3 Goal : FIRST diagnose why the P3-S25.1 ingestion repeatedly stops; ONLY THEN, if a valid checkpoint and understood cause exist, resume. Outcome this run : STAGE A COMPLETE. STAGE B NOT STARTED (see verdict below). Status : E — ENVIRONMENT/EXECUTION LIMITATION (root cause identified) Next : resume preconditioned on a valid real-source checkpoint, which does not yet exist. ``` ## 1. Interrupted attempts observed The session brief references three stopped attempts of the 34.5 GB Tickstory ingestion. On-disk evidence (this repo, terminal, Temp, logs) does not contain three durable, distinct run records. What is present: | Attempt evidence | Artifact found | |---|---| | Prior attempt(s) | `p3_s25_external_data_validation/output/s25_execution_status.json` — "full tick→M15 ingest not completable in session budget"; handover `SESSION_HANDOVER_2026-08-26_P3_S25_EXTERNAL_DATA_BASIS_VALIDATION.md` — FINAL CLASSIFICATION **E-UNRESOLVED**, "could NOT complete within the session's compute budget". | | Current real-source checkpoint | **NONE valid.** Only `ml/p3/p3_s251_external_ingest/output/p3_s251_checkpoint.json` exists, and it references `run_id: "src_clean"`, source `scratch\mt100.csv` (a 4,747-byte **test fixture**, not the 34.5 GB source). | | Partial M15/M30 real-source output | **NONE.** Only fixture/scratch outputs exist. | | Recovery log / run manifest / .tmp / lock | NONE present (searched project tree + `MQL5\Files\Temp`). | | Original source file | `MQL5\Files\XAUUSD_mt5_ticks.csv`, 34,473,661,010 bytes, mtime 2026-08-24 22:44:41. | Conclusion: the ingest has not recorded a completed chunk against the real source in any successfully-checkpointed invocation. ## 2. Failure signature classification (A3) The repeated stoppage is best classified as: ```text TYPE : (1) AI-assistant / session execution interruption SIGNATURE : A — command/execution timeout (wall-clock / compute-budget exhaustion) ``` Supporting evidence: - The P3-S25 authoritative record explicitly states the full ingest could not complete within the session wall-clock/compute budget. - Measured in this session: a benign, read-only full-source SHA-256 pass takes **~153 seconds** on this machine. The `IngestRun.begin()` computes the full source SHA-256 (streaming 34.5 GB) *before* any chunk is processed, and the `run()` method processes the **entire remaining file** in one long-lived Python subprocess with a default chunk of 4,000,000 rows. - There is no durable checkpoint of a real run, consistent with each attempt being terminated (command/tool/session) before completing/committing a chunk. Why the design makes an in-session completion unlikely: 1. `begin()` hashes the entire 34.5 GB file in-memory streaming (~153 s) and only silently stores the SHA; a real chunk is processed after that. 2. The chunked checkpoint is written only *after* a whole chunk is processed; a killed session leaves no durable record -> the stale test-fixture checkpoint remains. 3. The default execution is effectively "process everything remaining" in one subprocess, which the environment cannot outlast. This is a **resource/execution** limitation, not a parser/data bug: the same bounded, streaming design is validated and the parser/aggregator are memory- bounded. No parser exception, no memory/disc exhaustion, no deadlock. ## 3. Last valid checkpoint (A7) ```text Valid real-source checkpoint: NONE. Latest checkpoint file contents (output/p3_s251_checkpoint.json): run_id : "src_clean" (test artifact) source_path : .../scratch/mt100.csv (test fixture, 4747 B) source_sha256 : d552b9e4… (fixture hash, not source) last_completed_chunk : 2 (of the fixture only) rows_processed : 101 (fixture only) => The checkpoint refers to a test fixture, NOT the 34.5 GB source. It cannot be used as a resume position for the real ingestion (A7 STOP rule). ``` ## 4. Source integrity ```text path : MQL5\Files\XAUUSD_mt5_ticks.csv size : 34,473,661,010 bytes mtime : 2026-08-24 22:44:41 UTC sha256 : 5252ce8f5b0e7d286b71a3172c7ef9c1009c8e4b1254ac67400a803fcd85cba1 (measured this session, read-only) rowcount (approx) coincident with S25 inventory: 722,941,870 rows ``` Source file is present and unchanged (size/mtime match the 2026-08-24 record). ## 5. Resource analysis (A4) — measured this session ``` Disk free (D:) : 850 GB -> sufficient RAM total/free : 47.9 / 36.1 GB -> sufficient for streaming chunked ingest Full-source SHA : ~153 s for a read-only hash (the dominant single-op cost) ``` Section storage / disk / RAM are not the blocker. The blocker is the single long-running command vs. session wall-clock compute budget. ## 5b. Pipeline validation test-suite run (this session, 16/20 PASS) Ran `s251_tests.py` (T01..T20, fixtures only — no real source). Result: **16/20 PASS**. The four failures are TEST-HARNESS expectation bugs, NOT pipeline defects: | Test | Result | Classification | |---|---|---| | T04 M15 boundary | FAIL | Expectation bug: test demands the *final incomplete* bucket be emitted; design deliberately carries it in `partial_carry_m15` and never emits it. Emitted buckets match design. | | T06 M30 boundary | FAIL | Same cause (final incomplete M30 bucket carried, not emitted). | | T15 future-data mutation | FAIL | **Test-code bug**: `dt.datetime(2026, tzinfo=...)` called without month/day -> TypeError. Not a pipeline error. | | T16 row-order mutation | FAIL | Expectation bug: the aggregator stably sorts ticks by timestamp (documented), so identical M15 output is CORRECT after a pure row permutation; the raw manifest DOES change (hash differs), which is the correct detection signal. Test's `pass` condition is inconsistent. | Independent verification signals that DO pass and are the meaningful evidence: T02 timestamp parsing, T03 UTC normalisation, T05/T07 independent-oracle equality, T08 chunk-hash determinism, T09 checkpoint atomicity, T10/T11/T12 resume equivalence incl. mid-bucket cuts, T13 malformed detection, T14 duplicate detection, T19 source-hash refusal, T20 subset determinism. Per CODE_VERIFICATION policy: PASS is not final evidence; however these tests plus the independent oracle (different code path) agree, which is the correct signal for the streaming pipeline. The four FAILs are test-harness defects and were NOT edited to force green (policy §0/§15: no silent modification). They should be repaired in a dedicated test-fix phase before the suite is treated as green. ## 6. Bounded-memory check (A5) - `s251_ingest._file_blocks` streams the file in 64 MiB blocks, `_line_stream` stays in Python lines up to `chunk_rows`. - `ChunkParser` keeps only per-chunk lists; `Aggregation` is a streaming state-machine, holding only the current open M15/M30 bucket. - No full-file `read()`, `readlines()`, no unbounded dict/list accumulation, no DataFrame accumulation. => **Bounded-memory: YES. Confirmed.** This is not the cause of failure. ## 7. Execution-model check (A6) The prior approach executed effectively the whole 34.5 GB source in a single **monolithic** subprocess (`run()` processes the entire remaining file). That is the unsafe architecture for this environment. Required corrective model: ```text ONE BOUNDED CHUNK -> VERIFY -> CHECKPOINT -> RETURN CONTROL (one Python invocation per chunk, or a small bounded batch with per-chunk checkpoints and atomic stop) ``` ## 8. Root-cause confidence ``` Confidence : MEDIUM ``` Reason: the execution/wall-clock limitation is well supported (documented P3-S25 record + measured 153 s full-hash + monolithic run model), but the "three attempts" are not individually evidenced in durable artifacts, so the exact instant/operation of each stop cannot be proven. The overall mechanism (research-execution bound) is established with MEDIUM confidence; the code design is consistent with repeated pre-chunk termination. ## 9. Classification ``` E — ENVIRONMENT/EXECUTION LIMITATION ``` ## 10. Why Stage B was NOT started Per protocol hard-stop conditions (A7 + session objective), ingestion may only resume when **BOTH**: (i) the checkpoint is proven valid, and (ii) the cause is identified with a safe strategy. (i) is NOT satisfied: the only checkpoint to hand is a test-fixture artifact (no valid real-source checkpoint exists). Per A7 ("If the latest checkpoint is invalid: STOP. Do not guess a resume position.") no resume byte-offset can be honestly chosen this session. Therefore **Stage B was not forced**. ## 11. Corrective execution strategy (recommended, NOT executed here) 1. Do NOT re-run a monolithic 34 GB command. 2. Initialize anew the real-source ingestion and **verify checkpoint against the source line before the first chunk** (the begin() SHA-256 check). 3. Execute **ONE bounded chunk per invocation** (e.g. default 4,000,000 rows), then VERIFY/WRITE CHECKPOINT, then STOP/return control; explicitly bound the run (constrain `max_chunks` in a small driver) so a session cannot exceed its budget. 4. After each chunk, verify full-source continuity in the checkpoint (source size/mtime/SHA-256) and record progress in a recovery log (run_id, chunk_id, byte_start, byte_end, rows, first/last ts, m151 count, m30 count, chunk_sha256, cp_sha256, elapsed, mem_peak, status). 5. If the environment still cannot run >1 chunk per session, fall back to the previously authorized deterministic subset strategy (documented separately) and classify honestly as SUBSET BASIS VALIDATED. ## 12. State - No ML, no training, no feature/label/TP/SL/H changes performed. - No MQL5 / production code changed. - No source files modified; the 34.5 GB CSV untouched. - No Dukascopy `.bi5` reverse-engineering started. - `p3_s251_subset_manifest.json` NOT written (subset fallback not used). - Final status: **E** ; Stage A complete; Stage B NOT started. *End of P3-S25.1 interruption diagnosis.*