Warrior_EA/Expert/AIBase/Training.mqh

//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
//|                                                       Warrior_EA |
//|                                                     AnimateDread |
//|                                                                  |
//| Era loop, plateau ladder, checkpoint selection, deploy/finalise.|
//|                                                                  |
//| PARTIAL IMPLEMENTATION FILE - not standalone.                     |
//| This holds CExpertSignalAIBase method BODIES only. The class      |
//| declaration lives in Expert\ExpertSignalAIBase.mqh, which         |
//| #includes this file at the bottom, after the declaration. Do not  |
//| include it anywhere else and do not compile it on its own.        |
//|                                                                  |
//| Split out purely to make the 8216-line original navigable; the    |
//| code inside was moved verbatim, not rewritten.                    |
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
#ifndef WARRIOR_AIBASE_TRAINING_MQH
#define WARRIOR_AIBASE_TRAINING_MQH
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
//| Training and Signal Methods                                      |
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
void CExpertSignalAIBase::Train(datetime StartTrainBar = 0)
  {
   //--- One-shot latch so a failing forward pass reports itself ONCE per call instead of once per
   //--- sample. CNet::feedForward's return value used to be discarded at all three call sites below,
   //--- which is how the 2026-08-02 run spent a whole era backpropagating against a batch-norm layer
   //--- whose device-side output had frozen: the only trace was 13,776 identical BufferWrite lines
   //--- from three frames deeper, and nothing said training was still running on top of them.
   bool forwardFailureReported = false;
   const int STABILITY_WINDOW = 3;         // consecutive eras the OOS accuracy must hold steady for
   const double STABILITY_TOLERANCE = 2.0; // max spread (percentage points) across that window
   // Max wall-clock work per call before yielding - see m_trainRunActive's declaration comment for
   // why chunking exists at all. TuneIndicatorsAndTrain()/Train() only run ONCE per dispatched
   // "New Bar" custom chart event (see OnChartEventHandler - id 1001 calls it exactly once, then
   // clears bEventStudy so ScheduleTrainingIfNeeded() can arm the next one), so the real throughput
   // ceiling in practice is however fast MT5 itself pumps/dispatches that custom event - NOT this
   // constant. Raising the OnTimer interval (5s->250ms) had ~zero effect for exactly that reason:
   // ticks/chart events were already redispatching far more often than the timer alone would. Since
   // per-event dispatch overhead is roughly fixed, doing more compute per event (fewer, larger
   // chunks) cuts wall-clock training time roughly in proportion, but MT5 has only this one thread -
   // the panel/chart can only respond to input in the gap between chunks, so 500ms made it feel
   // unresponsive unless clicks landed in that narrow window. Lowered back to 120ms to keep the UI
   // reactive. Raised to 200ms 2026-07-26 (throughput became the bigger complaint, as flagged above) -
   // a deliberate middle ground between the reactive-but-slow 120ms and the previously-rejected 500ms,
   // not a return to that. Watch panel drag/click feel after this change; back off toward 120ms if it
   // regresses, or raise further only in small steps if it doesn't.
   // 2026-07-30: it regressed, exactly as that warning anticipated - the panel drags stickily and
   // buttons miss clicks under load, because 200ms is the worst-case latency between a click landing
   // and this thread being free to notice it. Backing off to the documented 120ms. The throughput this
   // costs is a far smaller sacrifice than it was when the note above was written: the derived topology
   // cut the network from ~292k weights to ~29k (see ComputeFirstLayerWidth), so an era is a fraction
   // of the work it used to be and the fixed per-dispatch overhead the note worried about is now a
   // correspondingly smaller share of it. Responsiveness is worth more than the remainder.
   const uint TRAIN_TIME_BUDGET_MS = 120;
//---
   //--- Never block the calling thread while paused/stopped - just decline this call (or finalize a
   //--- run that just got stopped) and let the next scheduled call check again, so Pause/Resume/Stop
   //--- and everything else on the control panel stays responsive instead of Sleep()-ing the one
   //--- MQL5 thread this chart has.
   if(m_trainingPaused && !IsStopped() && !m_trainingStopRequested)
      return;
   bool stop = IsStopped() || m_trainingStopRequested;
   if(stop)
     {
      if(m_trainRunActive)
         FinalizeTrainRun();
      if(m_simOosRunActive)
        {
         delete m_simOosNet;
         m_simOosNet = NULL;
         m_simOosRunActive = false;
        }
      return;
     }
   //--- Evaluation-only continual-learning OOS simulation walk in progress (see StartOosContinualSimulation):
   //--- give it exclusive occupancy of this call, same chunked budget as the real era loop below, so a
   //--- large OOS window can't freeze the UI in one shot. While it's active no real-training
   //--- ResizeBuffers()/RefreshData() runs, so the price/ATR/time buffers it reads stay frozen for its
   //--- whole walk - it never has to worry about the label cache's shifting-index invalidation below.
   if(m_simOosRunActive)
     {
      AdvanceOosSimulationChunk();
      return;
     }
   //--- Eager label-cache pre-build in progress (see StartLabelCachePrebuild/AdvanceLabelCachePrebuild) -
   //--- same exclusive-occupancy/chunking treatment as the OOS simulation walk above, so it can't freeze
   //--- the UI on a large study window either. m_trainRunActive stays false for its whole duration, so
   //--- once it completes, Train() falls through to the normal !m_trainRunActive setup below and era 0
   //--- starts from the measured class distribution it just seeded.
   if(m_labelPrebuildActive)
     {
      AdvanceLabelCachePrebuild();
      return;
     }
   if(!m_trainRunActive)
     {
      //--- Wait (briefly, bounded, non-blocking across calls) for the terminal to finish syncing this
      //--- symbol/period's history from the broker before computing the training window. Bars(symbol,
      //--- period) - the hard cap on how many bars the era loop below will ever process - reflects
      //--- whatever's synced SO FAR, not necessarily the true total; starting before sync completes
      //--- would let that cap (and therefore the "Bar X of Y" progress display) silently grow between
      //--- eras as more history trickles in.
      if(!SeriesInfoInteger(m_symbol.Name(), PERIOD_CURRENT, SERIES_SYNCHRONIZED))
        {
         uint syncNowTick = GetTickCount();
         if(m_syncWaitStartTick == 0)
            m_syncWaitStartTick = syncNowTick;
         if(syncNowTick - m_syncWaitStartTick < 5000)
            return; // retry on the next scheduled call instead of blocking here
         Print(ID + ": WARNING - history for " + m_symbol.Name() + " " + EnumToString(PERIOD_CURRENT) + " did not finish syncing after 5s; training window may still grow as more history arrives");
        }
      m_syncWaitStartTick = 0;
      //--- 3 no-op passes before the era loop ever runs for a fresh start (see m_warmupPassesRemaining's
      //--- declaration comment) - each is its own separately-scheduled Train() call (this whole method
      //--- just returns, deferring to the next "New Bar"/timer-driven call), giving MT5's history sync
      //--- several real, wall-clock-separated chances to settle on top of the 5s soft wait just above,
      //--- before training commits to a bar count and starts populating the label cache below.
      if(m_warmupPassesRemaining > 0)
        {
         m_warmupPassesRemaining--;
         PrintVerbose(ID + ": warm-up pass " + IntegerToString(3 - m_warmupPassesRemaining) + " of 3 (letting history sync settle before training starts)");
         return;
        }
      //--- ALL available history, floored by MinTrainYear. The StudyPeriods input this replaces could only
      //--- ever throw data away: the signal is weak and the directional classes are rare, so every extra
      //--- year is more of the minority class, and the honest generalization read comes from the OOS
      //--- holdout rather than from withholding history from training. MinTrainYear survives because it
      //--- answers a different question - excluding a broker's dubious pre-history - not "how much".
      //--- Note the ordering: SERIES_FIRSTDATE is the floor of what EXISTS, MinTrainYear the floor of what
      //--- is TRUSTED, and the window starts at whichever is later.
      datetime firstAvailableBar = (datetime)SeriesInfoInteger(m_symbol.Name(), PERIOD_CURRENT, SERIES_FIRSTDATE);
      MqlDateTime floor_time;
      TimeCurrent(floor_time);
      floor_time.year = m_minTrainYear;
      floor_time.mon  = 1;
      floor_time.day  = 1;
      floor_time.hour = 0;
      floor_time.min  = 0;
      floor_time.sec  = 0;
      datetime st_time = StructToTime(floor_time);
      if(firstAvailableBar > st_time)
         st_time = firstAvailableBar;
      dtStudied = MathMax(StartTrainBar, st_time);
      //--- OOS-based objective + stability tracking: training only "converges" once the objective is
      //--- met AND OOS accuracy has held inside a tight band for the last few eras, so a single lucky
      //--- era can't get locked in as the final model. The best-scoring era's weights are checkpointed
      //--- to an agent-local scratch file (not FILE_COMMON) and restored at the end - this works inside
      //--- the tester too, unlike Net.Save()/Load() which are disabled there.
      m_oosWindow.Clear();
      m_bestOosForecast = -1;
      m_bestBalancedOos = -1;
      m_bestPassedRecall = false;
      m_haveOosCheckpoint = false;
      m_oosStable = false;
      m_objectiveMet = false;
      m_erasSinceCooldown = 0;
      m_eraResumePending = false;
      //--- Plateau ladder starts fresh with this run, so it re-walks the escalation from its own
      //--- starting point. (The focal-gamma anneal that used to reset here went with focal loss on
      //--- 2026-07-31 - the ladder's real escape is the learning-rate warm restart.)
      m_erasSinceBestBalanced = 0;
      m_plateauStage = 0;
      //--- One-time eager pre-scan for a fresh start (see m_labelCachePrebuilt's declaration comment) -
      //--- kick it off and defer era 0 until it's done, so era 0 can start with a real class-balance
      //--- oversampling ratio instead of the reps=1 fallback. Routed via the m_labelPrebuildActive gate
      //--- above on every subsequent call until it completes.
      if(!m_labelCachePrebuilt)
        {
         StartLabelCachePrebuild();
         return;
        }
      m_trainRunActive = true;
     }
   int bars, totalIter, oosCutoff, i;
   bool add_loop;
   if(!m_eraResumePending)
     {
      int barsNow = (int)MathMin(Bars(m_symbol.Name(), PERIOD_CURRENT, dtStudied, TimeCurrent()) + m_historyBars, Bars(m_symbol.Name(), PERIOD_CURRENT));
      if(!ResizeBuffers(barsNow) || !RefreshData())
        {
         FinalizeTrainRun();
         return;
        }
      bars = barsNow;
      //--- Cross-asset panel is indexed against exactly this bar grid, so it is (re)built wherever
      //--- the grid is - never per bar. Non-fatal on failure; see BuildCrossAssetPanel().
      BuildCrossAssetPanel(barsNow);
      EnsureSpreadSeries(barsNow);
      add_loop = false;
      //--- Label/feature cache invalidation: MQL5 timeseries indices are always relative to "now"
      //--- (index 0 = current bar), so every new closed candle shifts every older bar's index - a
      //--- cache keyed by index would silently misalign the moment that happens. See
      //--- EnsureBarCachesCapacity() for why `bars` + m_Time.GetData(0) are the correct/sufficient
      //--- invalidation keys.
      //--- When a wipe happens MID-RUN (a new candle closed while training was still going - e.g. the
      //--- market reopening after the weekend), the label cache comes back empty and the lazy per-bar
      //--- fallback (ComputeLabelForBar) labels everything Neutral by design (recent pivots are
      //--- unconfirmable) - so continuing on a wiped cache silently turns the REST OF THE RUN into
      //--- training AND scoring against an all-Neutral world. Observed 2026-07-19: eras 18-20 started
      //--- right after the Sunday session open - IS error collapsed 0.44->0.22, OOS "accuracy" soared
      //--- to 84.9% with Buy/Sell recall n/a and era time halved, the convergence machinery happily
      //--- rewarding all-Neutral predictions on 100%-Neutral relabeled truth. Re-arm the same chunked
      //--- eager prebuild that seeded era 0 and defer this era until it completes; its completion
      //--- re-seeds the class tallies (m_prebuildSeedPending) so the next era's priors reflect the
      //--- freshly relabeled window.
      if(EnsureBarCachesCapacity(bars) && m_labelCachePrebuilt)
        {
         StartLabelCachePrebuild();
         return;
        }
      //--- freeze the just-finished era's true class totals for this new era's priors (see
      //--- m_prevEraTrueBuyCount's declaration comment) before resetting the live counters below - EXCEPT
      //--- right after StartLabelCachePrebuild()/AdvanceLabelCachePrebuild() seeded them for era 0: the
      //--- live m_trueBuyCount/Sell/Neutral tally is still all-zero at that point (nothing trained yet),
      //--- so copying it here would silently stomp the real upfront tally back to an empty distribution.
      if(m_prebuildSeedPending)
         m_prebuildSeedPending = false;
      else
        {
         m_prevEraTrueBuyCount = m_trueBuyCount;
         m_prevEraTrueSellCount = m_trueSellCount;
         m_prevEraTrueNeutralCount = m_trueNeutralCount;
        }
      //--- Natural class base rates for the live logit-adjusted decision (see AdjustedSignalFromSoftmax):
      //--- derived from the same just-finished-era true class totals the oversampling ratio uses, so live
      //--- calibrates to exactly the distribution the model was measured against. Both branches above
      //--- leave m_prevEraTrue* holding the freshest real tally (prebuild-seeded on era 0, copied here
      //--- otherwise), so updating from them here covers both paths.
      //--- 2026-08-01: THE `if(!m_evalMode)` GUARD THAT USED TO WRAP THIS IS GONE, because it silently
      //--- disabled the entire imbalance correction for the whole auto-tune search. ApplyLogitAdjustment()
      //--- immediately below needs measured priors; without them it clears the offsets and returns. In
      //--- eval mode the priors were never measured, so every GA candidate - which is to say every era of
      //--- a run with AutoTuneIndicators on, the shipped default - trained under PLAIN cross-entropy.
      //--- That was invisible while the labels were near-balanced and became a total Neutral collapse the
      //--- moment a 2:6 barrier put the majority class at 52.5%: recall Buy 0% / Sell 0% / Neutral 100%
      //--- by era 5 on all four topologies, and the panel stuck on "measuring..." because a model that
      //--- never calls a direction never accumulates a directional tally.
      //--- The guard's stated fear - a search contaminating the deployed calibration - cannot happen:
      //--- these priors are measured from the LABEL distribution, and the tuner only perturbs indicator
      //--- periods (MA/RSI/MACD/Ichimoku/AD). The barrier label depends on ATR, SL_Mode and TP_Mode, none
      //--- of which the search touches, so every candidate sees byte-identical labels and therefore
      //--- identical priors. There is nothing for a candidate to contaminate. What the guard actually
      //--- protected against is the .stats WRITE, and that is gated separately (eval candidates never
      //--- checkpoint - see m_haveOosCheckpoint - and never persist).
      UpdateClassPriors(m_prevEraTrueBuyCount, m_prevEraTrueSellCount, m_prevEraTrueNeutralCount);
      //--- Re-install the training-time logit offsets from the priors just measured, so this
      //--- era's gradient tracks the distribution the era is scored against. Runs in eval mode
      //--- too: a GA candidate must train under the same loss as the real run or its score
      //--- means nothing - only the PERSISTED calibration is withheld from eval mode.
      ApplyLogitAdjustment();
      m_countBuySignals = 0;
      m_countSellSignals = 0;
      m_countNeutralSignals = 0;
      m_trueBuyCount = 0;
      m_trueSellCount = 0;
      m_trueNeutralCount = 0;
      m_oosBuyHits = 0;
      m_oosBuyTotal = 0;
      m_oosSellHits = 0;
      m_oosSellTotal = 0;
      m_oosNeutralHits = 0;
      m_oosNeutralTotal = 0;
      m_oosBuyPredicted = 0;
      m_oosBuyPredictedHits = 0;
      m_oosSellPredicted = 0;
      m_oosSellPredictedHits = 0;
      m_oosNeutralPredicted = 0;
      m_oosNeutralPredictedHits = 0;
      m_oosBuyFired = 0;
      m_oosBuyFiredHits = 0;
      m_oosSellFired = 0;
      m_oosSellFiredHits = 0;
      ArrayInitialize(m_oosTierFired, 0);
      ArrayInitialize(m_oosTierHits, 0);
      m_oosConfidenceSum = 0;
      // Nearest-to-present slice of this era's bars is held out as OOS and never backprop'd on;
      // the rest (older bars) is the IS/training slice.
      totalIter = (int)MathMax(bars - MathMax(m_historyBars, 0), 0);
      oosCutoff = (int)(MathMax(0, MathMin(100, m_oosSplitPct)) / 100.0 * totalIter);
      i = (int)(bars - MathMax(m_historyBars, 0) - 1);
      //--- Fresh era: reset pass 2's shuffled-backprop queue (see m_isTrainQueue's declaration
      //--- comment). Preallocated to a parity-shaped ESTIMATE, not a hard worst case: at full parity
      //--- all 3 classes replicate to ~the majority count, so the queue lands near 3x totalIter -
      //--- 4x covers that plus label drift. The queueing block below grows the arrays on demand if an
      //--- era ever exceeds the estimate (it used to silently DROP overflow instead - harmless at the
      //--- old totalIter*cap sizing, which could never fill, but real data loss now that the measured
      //--- ratio, not a small fixed cap, decides the replica count).
      ArrayResize(m_isTrainQueue, totalIter * 4);
      ArrayResize(m_isTrainQueueWeightScale, totalIter * 4);
      ArrayResize(m_isTrainQueuePrimary, totalIter * 4);
      m_isTrainQueueCount = 0;
      m_isTrainCursor = 0;
      m_isPass2Active = false;
      m_isPass2Done = false;
      m_isPass3Active = false;
      //--- Fresh per-era predicted-signal cache for the end-of-era NMS sweep (see PruneDirectionalClusters).
      //--- -2 = "not scored this era" so stale bars from a longer prior era can't draw phantom arrows.
      if(m_signalClusterWindow > 0)
        {
         ArrayResize(m_arrowSignalCache, bars);
         ArrayInitialize(m_arrowSignalCache, -2.0);
        }
     }
   else
     {
      //--- resuming a chunk that yielded mid-bar-loop last call - pick up exactly where it left off
      bars = m_resumeBars;
      totalIter = m_resumeTotalIter;
      oosCutoff = m_resumeOosCutoff;
      add_loop = m_resumeAddLoop;
      i = m_resumeBarIndex;
      m_eraResumePending = false;
     }
   // Restore this model's own learning-rate trajectory into the shared global right before this
   // chunk's backProp() calls touch it - see m_modelEta's declaration comment.
   eta = m_modelEta;
   uint chunkStartTick = GetTickCount();
   // Iterate over the bars - skipped entirely when resuming straight into pass 2, OR when resuming
   // into a still-unfinished pass 3 (see m_isPass2Done's declaration comment for why checking
   // m_isPass2Active alone isn't enough to detect the latter case): pass 1 already fully completed
   // in an earlier call either way.
   if(!m_isPass2Active && !m_isPass2Done)
     {
   for(; i >= 0 && !stop; i--)
     {
         //--- Build THIS bar's own feature window and feed it forward BEFORE checking/training against
         //--- its label - see r's declaration comment below for why the window must end AT bar i, and
         //--- why this must run before the label-check block rather than after: the label check needs
         //--- this bar's own freshly-computed prediction, not the previous iteration's (see windowOk).
         TempData.Clear();
         //--- Window ends AT (includes) bar i itself, extending m_historyBars bars into the past - i.e.
         //--- "everything known as of this bar's close." Predicting label(i) - "was THIS bar the
         //--- reversal" - from a window that stops short of bar i itself would blind the model to the
         //--- most recent price action, which is exactly the information a reversal call most depends
         //--- on. Must match RefreshLatestSignal()'s window exactly (r=i there too, i=0), since that's
         //--- what actually queries the deployed model live - training on a different window than what
         //--- gets queried at inference time would teach the wrong task entirely.
         //--- BuildFeatureWindow() owns the Clear/Reserve/loop AND the oldest-bar-first ordering that
         //--- the LSTM stacks depend on - see its definition comment.
         int r = i;
         bool windowOk = false;
         double displayNeuron0 = 0, displayNeuron1 = 0, displayNeuron2 = 0;
         if(r <= bars)
           {
            windowOk = BuildFeatureWindow(r);
            if(windowOk)
               add_loop = true;
           }
         //--- Determine label/queue-eligibility BEFORE running any feedForward this bar - see
         //--- wouldQueue's use below for why. Mirrors the label-check condition this block used to
         //--- gate on (moved earlier, unchanged).
         bool haveLabel = false, buy = false, sell = false, wouldQueue = false;
         if(windowOk && i < (int)(bars - MathMax(m_historyBars, 0) - 1) && i > 1 && m_Time.GetData(i) > dtStudied
            && (m_outputNeuronsCount == 1 || m_outputNeuronsCount == 3))
           {
            //--- The fractal/swing-confirmation/trend-context label at now-relative index i only depends
            //--- on price/ATR history, never on model state, so it's identical every era until a new bar
            //--- closes and shifts the index frame (see the cache invalidation check above) - cache it
            //--- rather than recomputing from scratch every single era. Usually already populated by
            //--- AdvanceLabelCachePrebuild() before era 0 ever starts - this is just a lazy fallback for
            //--- any index it didn't cover (e.g. bars/window drifted between prebuild and era 0's start).
            if(m_labelCacheHasValue[i])
              {
               buy  = m_labelCacheBuy[i];
               sell = m_labelCacheSell[i];
              }
            else
              {
               ComputeLabelForBar(i, bars, buy, sell);
               m_labelCacheBuy[i] = buy;
               m_labelCacheSell[i] = sell;
               m_labelCacheHasValue[i] = true;
              }
            haveLabel = true;
            bool isOOS = (i < oosCutoff);
            // Embargo: a bar's triple-barrier label is decided by the m_barrierHorizonBars bars that
            // follow it (see TripleBarrierLabel()). An IS bar within that distance of the OOS boundary
            // therefore carries a label that was only knowable using price action from inside the
            // held-out OOS window - purge that narrow band from backprop entirely instead of training
            // on it as ordinary IS. Lopez de Prado ch. 7 calls this purging, and it is the whole reason
            // a naive train/test split leaks on overlapping-horizon financial labels.
            // Was m_swingConfirmationBars + LABEL_WINDOW_BARS, which measured the ZigZag repainting
            // delay - the correct quantity for the old target and the wrong one for this label.
            int embargoBars = MathMax(m_barrierHorizonBars, 1);
            bool isEmbargoed = (!isOOS && i < oosCutoff + embargoBars);
            wouldQueue = (!isOOS && !isEmbargoed);
           }
         //--- Only run this bar's feedForward (and the display/count/chart-draw work that depends on
         //--- it) when pass 2 ISN'T about to redo it anyway. A queued bar gets a completely fresh
         //--- feedForward moments later in pass 2 (see m_isTrainQueue's declaration comment - other
         //--- queued bars ahead of it in the shuffled order may already have updated weights, so pass
         //--- 2 can't reuse this scan's result even if it wanted to) - running it here too was one
         //--- full forward pass per training sample thrown straight in the trash every era, on top of
         //--- the one pass 2 actually needs. The book's SGD (references\neuronetworksbook.pdf, section
         //--- 1.4) is one forward+backward pass per training sample, not two.
         //--- Display/IS-scoring only on this path, but the same rule applies: getResults() after a
         //--- failed pass returns the previous bar's activations, which would be shown on the panel and
         //--- counted as this bar's prediction.
         if(windowOk && !wouldQueue && Net.feedForward(TempData))
           {
            Net.getResults(TempData);
            if(m_outputNeuronsCount == 1)
               dPrevSignal = TempData[0];
            else
               if(m_outputNeuronsCount == 3)
                  dPrevSignal = ApplyClassificationSoftmax();
            //--- Snapshot the just-computed neuron output(s) for the status label display below, before
            //--- the label-check block clears/refills TempData with the target label (Step A always
            //--- runs after this point now) - reading TempData directly for display after that would
            //--- show the TRUE LABEL of the bar just trained on, not the network's own prediction.
            if(TempData.Total() > 0)
               displayNeuron0 = TempData[0];
            if(TempData.Total() > 1)
               displayNeuron1 = TempData[1];
            if(TempData.Total() > 2)
               displayNeuron2 = TempData[2];
            switch(DoubleToSignal(dPrevSignal))
              {
               case Buy:
                  m_countBuySignals++;
                  break;
               case Sell:
                  m_countSellSignals++;
                  break;
               default:
                  m_countNeutralSignals++;
                  break;
              }
            m_lastBarTime = m_Time.GetData(i);
            if(i > 0)
              {
               // NMS on: record only - the era-end sweep is the SOLE renderer, so no raw (un-
               // declustered) arrow is ever drawn mid-era. NMS off: draw inline as before.
               if(m_signalClusterWindow > 0)
                 {
                  if(i < ArraySize(m_arrowSignalCache))
                     m_arrowSignalCache[i] = dPrevSignal;
                 }
               else
                  if(DoubleToSignal(dPrevSignal) == Neutral)
                     DeleteObject(m_lastBarTime);
                  else
                     DrawObject(m_lastBarTime, dPrevSignal, m_High.GetData(i), m_Low.GetData(i));
              }
            UpdateTrainingStatusLabel(
               StringFormat("Bar %d of %d -> %.2f%% (scan)", bars - i + 1, bars, (double)(bars - i + 1.0) / bars * 100),
               displayNeuron0, displayNeuron1, displayNeuron2, dPrevSignal);
           }
         if(haveLabel)
           {
            // True label as an ENUM_SIGNAL, derived directly from the buy/sell bools - not read
            // back from TempData, which no longer holds a target at this point at all (see above).
            ENUM_SIGNAL trueSignal = buy ? Buy : (sell ? Sell : Neutral);
            // Track the true class distribution this era (used below to weight IS oversampling,
            // and surfaced in the status label text alongside the predicted-class counts)
            switch(trueSignal)
              {
               case Buy:
                  m_trueBuyCount++;
                  break;
               case Sell:
                  m_trueSellCount++;
                  break;
               default:
                  m_trueNeutralCount++;
                  break;
              }
            // OOS scoring used to happen right here, against whatever weights this bar's earlier
            // feedForward (this pass) happened to be using - which for era 0 is the network's
            // still-untrained cold-start state (100% Neutral - see the output-layer bias seed's
            // declaration comment), and for every later era is last era's END-of-training state,
            // never THIS era's. That silently gave every era's OOS score a full one-era lag behind
            // its own training, and made era 0's OOS score meaningless by construction. OOS scoring
            // now happens in its own pass (see m_isPass3Active's declaration comment), AFTER pass 2
            // has actually trained on this era's IS data, against a fresh feedForward on each OOS
            // bar rather than this scan's now-stale one.
            if(wouldQueue)
              {
               // Queue this bar for pass 2's shuffled backProp instead of training on it here,
               // immediately, in strict chronological order - see m_isTrainQueue's declaration
               // comment for the full rationale. The predicted-signal counts, the chart-marker draw,
               // and the dForecast/dUndefine IS-accuracy update are all computed in pass 2 instead,
               // against that bar's own freshly-recomputed confidence - see the matching block right
               // after pass 2's Net.feedForward() call.
               //
               // EVERY BAR IS QUEUED EXACTLY ONCE. Class imbalance is corrected analytically inside
               // the gradient by the logit-adjusted loss, not by duplicating minority bars here.
               //
               // The history is worth keeping, because it is why the data-level approach was
               // abandoned rather than merely re-tuned. Four successive versions of oversampling all
               // collapsed, in both directions:
               //   v1  uncapped replication x an independent loss weight (up to ~4.5x total) ->
               //       Buy-only collapse, OOS ~10%, IS error 0.37->0.57 in 4 eras.
               //   v2  capped the ratio before splitting it between the two -> mathematically the
               //       same total correction as pure loss weighting, which had already failed.
               //   v3  replication alone, capped at 3x against a ~5.3x imbalance -> Neutral collapse,
               //       Buy/Sell recall 0% for 6 straight eras (2026-07-18).
               //   v4  replication to ~90% parity (up to 28x) -> measured across six topologies on
               //       2026-07-29, every model drove ONE direction to ~50% recall and abandoned the
               //       other, and which direction was arbitrary. One era in 1,301 cleared the floor.
               // The through-line: replication makes Buy and Sell compete for the same replicated
               // capacity, and Adam's mt/sqrt(vt) normalisation (Kingma & Ba 2015) is near-invariant
               // to the gradient rescaling that the loss-weighted variants relied on. Per Buda, Maki
               // & Mazurowski 2018, stacking data-level and cost-level corrections on one axis is not
               // reliably additive - and the logit-adjusted loss replaces BOTH with a single
               // correction that is provably consistent for balanced error.
               //
               // Pass 2 still Fisher-Yates shuffles the queue: chronological order correlates
               // consecutive gradients, which is the same correlated-momentum overshoot documented at
               // AI\Network.mqh's MAX_WEIGHT_DELTA comment. That reason is independent of replication
               // and survives it.
               //--- MINORITY REPLAY REMOVED 2026-07-31. Every bar is queued exactly once; class
               //--- imbalance is corrected analytically in the gradient by the logit-adjusted loss
               //--- (Menon et al. 2021) instead of by duplicating rare bars in the data. Stacking the
               //--- two double-counts the same imbalance - Buda et al. 2018 - and the replay branch had
               //--- in fact been gated OFF for the whole shipped configuration, so this is the code
               //--- catching up with the behaviour rather than a change in it. Measured 2026-07-29
               //--- across six topologies, replay made Buy and Sell compete for the same replicated
               //--- capacity: every model drove ONE direction to ~50% recall and abandoned the other,
               //--- and which direction was arbitrary. One era in 1,301 cleared the per-class floor.
               int repCount = 1;
               double perOccurrenceScale = 1.0;
               //--- grow on demand (reserve keeps this amortized-rare) - the prealloc above is an
               //--- estimate, and dropping overflow would silently starve exactly the minority
               //--- classes the replication exists to protect
               if(m_isTrainQueueCount + repCount > ArraySize(m_isTrainQueue))
                 {
                  int newQueueSize = m_isTrainQueueCount + repCount;
                  ArrayResize(m_isTrainQueue, newQueueSize, 16384);
                  ArrayResize(m_isTrainQueueWeightScale, newQueueSize, 16384);
                  ArrayResize(m_isTrainQueuePrimary, newQueueSize, 16384);
                 }
               for(int rep = 0; rep < repCount; rep++)
                 {
                  m_isTrainQueue[m_isTrainQueueCount] = i;
                  m_isTrainQueueWeightScale[m_isTrainQueueCount] = perOccurrenceScale;
                  //--- rep 0 is this bar's single "counts once" occurrence - see m_isTrainQueuePrimary.
                  //--- Every rep still trains; only the reported IS accuracy looks at this flag.
                  m_isTrainQueuePrimary[m_isTrainQueueCount] = (rep == 0);
                  m_isTrainQueueCount++;
                 }
              }
           }
         stop = IsStopped() || m_trainingStopRequested;
         if(!stop && i > 0 && GetTickCount() - chunkStartTick >= TRAIN_TIME_BUDGET_MS)
           {
            //--- yield: save exactly enough to resume this same era, mid-bar-loop, on the next call -
            //--- see m_trainRunActive's declaration comment for why this must happen instead of
            //--- letting one era (or the whole run) process synchronously to completion
            m_resumeBars = bars;
            m_resumeTotalIter = totalIter;
            m_resumeOosCutoff = oosCutoff;
            m_resumeAddLoop = add_loop;
            m_resumeBarIndex = i - 1;
            m_eraResumePending = true;
            // Save this model's own learning-rate trajectory back out of the shared global before
            // yielding - see m_modelEta's declaration comment.
            m_modelEta = eta;
            return;
           }
        }
     } // end if(!m_isPass2Active) - pass 1
   //--- Pass 2: replay the bars pass 1 queued into m_isTrainQueue for backProp, in a freshly
   //--- shuffled order - see m_isTrainQueue's declaration comment for the full rationale. Runs
   //--- whenever pass 1 just finished (or we resumed straight into an already-active pass 2 - see
   //--- m_isPass2Active's declaration comment); skipped on a stopped run, an era with no valid window
   //--- at all (add_loop still false), or - critically - a resume into a still-unfinished pass 3 (see
   //--- m_isPass2Done's declaration comment): without this last check, that resume would re-shuffle
   //--- and replay the ENTIRE queue again from scratch every single call.
   if(!stop && add_loop && !m_isPass2Done)
     {
      if(!m_isPass2Active)
        {
         m_isPass2Active = true;
         m_isTrainCursor = 0;
         // 2026-07-28: a "replay-only optimizer override" was removed from here. It captured every
         // neuron's optimizer and forced the whole net to SGD for the duration of pass 2, on the
         // rationale that oversampled minority bars should not "exploit the same Adam-style momentum
         // path as the base training pass". But pass 2 IS the base training pass - it is the only place
         // Net.backProp() is called during training at all (pass 1 only feeds forward and queues) - so
         // the override applied to 100% of weight updates, not to some replay subset.
         // Adam's mt/vt were therefore never updated and its bias-correction step counter never
         // advanced: TrainingOptimizer=ADAM was silently a no-op and the model trained purely on
         // SGD+momentum at Adam's learning rate. It arrived with the DFA change set and was never part
         // of any validated run. The optimizer the user selects is now the optimizer that runs.
         // Fisher-Yates shuffle - a fresh random order every era, so Adam's momentum can't keep
         // landing on the same contiguous same-class label run at the same point in the sequence every
         // single era. Barrier labels make those runs LONGER than the old exact-pivot ones (adjacent
         // bars share most of their forward window, so they usually resolve the same way), which makes
         // the shuffle matter more here, not less. m_isTrainQueueWeightScale is swapped in lockstep - each
         // slot's stored per-occurrence weight (see the queueing block's oversampling comment) must
         // stay attached to the same bar index it was computed for.
         for(int sIdx = m_isTrainQueueCount - 1; sIdx > 0; sIdx--)
           {
            int sJ = MathRand() % (sIdx + 1);
            int sTmp = m_isTrainQueue[sIdx];
            m_isTrainQueue[sIdx] = m_isTrainQueue[sJ];
            m_isTrainQueue[sJ] = sTmp;
            double sScaleTmp = m_isTrainQueueWeightScale[sIdx];
            m_isTrainQueueWeightScale[sIdx] = m_isTrainQueueWeightScale[sJ];
            m_isTrainQueueWeightScale[sJ] = sScaleTmp;
            //--- the primary flag must travel with its own slot too, or the "count this bar once"
            //--- marker would end up attached to a different bar's occurrence - see m_isTrainQueuePrimary
            bool sPrimTmp = m_isTrainQueuePrimary[sIdx];
            m_isTrainQueuePrimary[sIdx] = m_isTrainQueuePrimary[sJ];
            m_isTrainQueuePrimary[sJ] = sPrimTmp;
           }
        }
      for(; m_isTrainCursor < m_isTrainQueueCount; m_isTrainCursor++)
        {
         int qi = m_isTrainQueue[m_isTrainCursor];
         bool qWindowOk = BuildFeatureWindow(qi);
         //--- A failed forward pass must NOT be followed by backProp() further down this block: the
         //--- output layer would still hold the PREVIOUS sample's activations, so the update would be
         //--- this bar's label against another bar's prediction - training on pure noise while every
         //--- accuracy counter kept reporting normally.
         bool qForwardOk = (qWindowOk && TempData.Total() >= (int)m_historyBars * m_neuronsCount &&
                            Net.feedForward(TempData));
         if(qWindowOk && !qForwardOk && !forwardFailureReported)
           {
            forwardFailureReported = true;
            Print(__FUNCTION__ + ": CNet::feedForward FAILED at era " + IntegerToString((int)m_eraCount) +
                  " - this era's remaining samples are being skipped, not trained. A layer is refusing to"
                  " accept its own output (check the preceding BufferWrite/BufferRead lines for which"
                  " buffer, and see NormalizeHost in AI\\NeuronBatchNorm.mqh for the batch-norm case).");
           }
         if(qForwardOk)
           {
            Net.getResults(TempData);
            // Must go through ApplyClassificationSoftmax() (3-output case) before reading the
            // per-class values below - Net.getResults() returns each output neuron's own independent
            // SIGMOID activation (each already in [0,1] but NOT summing to 1 across the three), not a
            // true class-conditional probability distribution; ApplyClassificationSoftmax() is what
            // turns that into one (and is also what pass 1/3's displayNeuron0/1/2 already go through).
            double qPrevSignal = (m_outputNeuronsCount == 3) ? ApplyClassificationSoftmax() : TempData[0];
            double pt0 = (TempData.Total() > 0) ? TempData[0] : 0.0;
            double pt1 = (TempData.Total() > 1) ? TempData[1] : 0.0;
            double pt2 = (TempData.Total() > 2) ? TempData[2] : 0.0;
            bool qBuy = m_labelCacheHasValue[qi] ? m_labelCacheBuy[qi] : false;
            bool qSell = m_labelCacheHasValue[qi] ? m_labelCacheSell[qi] : false;
            ENUM_SIGNAL qTrueSignal = qBuy ? Buy : (qSell ? Sell : Neutral);
            UpdateTrainingStatusLabel(
               StringFormat("Training bar %d of %d -> %.2f%% (shuffled)", m_isTrainCursor + 1, m_isTrainQueueCount, (double)(m_isTrainCursor + 1.0) / MathMax(m_isTrainQueueCount, 1) * 100),
               pt0, pt1, pt2, qPrevSignal);
            //--- Predicted-signal tally, chart marker, and IS-accuracy stat that pass 1 used to compute
            //--- from its own (now-removed) redundant feedForward on this same bar - see pass 1's
            //--- wouldQueue comment. Uses THIS feedForward's result (the only one this bar gets), so
            //--- these now reflect the model's state as of this bar's own turn in the shuffled replay
            //--- (post any earlier-shuffled bar's backProp this era), not a separate pre-training
            //--- snapshot - matching how a standard shuffled-epoch SGD run reports running training
            //--- accuracy during the epoch rather than in a discarded pre-epoch dry run.
            switch(DoubleToSignal(qPrevSignal))
              {
               case Buy:
                  m_countBuySignals++;
                  break;
               case Sell:
                  m_countSellSignals++;
                  break;
               default:
                  m_countNeutralSignals++;
                  break;
              }
            datetime qBarTime = m_Time.GetData(qi);
            // NMS on: record only (the era-end sweep renders); off: draw inline. See pass 1's note.
            if(m_signalClusterWindow > 0)
              {
               if(qi < ArraySize(m_arrowSignalCache))
                  m_arrowSignalCache[qi] = qPrevSignal;
              }
            else
               if(DoubleToSignal(qPrevSignal) == Neutral)
                  DeleteObject(qBarTime);
               else
                  DrawObject(qBarTime, qPrevSignal, m_High.GetData(qi), m_Low.GetData(qi));
            bool qClassified = (DoubleToSignal(qPrevSignal) == Buy || DoubleToSignal(qPrevSignal) == Sell || DoubleToSignal(qPrevSignal) == Neutral);
            if(qClassified)
              {
               bool isHit = (DoubleToSignal(qPrevSignal) == qTrueSignal);
               if(isHit)
                  dForecast += (100 - dForecast) / Net.recentAverageSmoothingFactor;
               else
                  dForecast -= dForecast / Net.recentAverageSmoothingFactor;
               dUndefine -= dUndefine / Net.recentAverageSmoothingFactor;
               //--- Compounded, persistent DIRECTIONAL win-rate: count only bars the model actually called
               //--- Buy or Sell (a Neutral "no trade" call is neither a win nor a loss), so this tracks the
               //--- accuracy of its directional signals rather than the Neutral-inflated all-class rate.
               //--- ...and count each BAR once, not each oversampled OCCURRENCE (m_isTrainQueuePrimary):
               //--- the queue duplicates minority bars up to ~21x, so counting every occurrence scored this
               //--- metric over a ~58%-directional set while its OOS counterpart scored the real ~6%
               //--- distribution - two numbers that look comparable, aren't, and made a healthy run read as
               //--- severe overfitting. See m_isTrainQueuePrimary for the worked example.
               ENUM_SIGNAL qPred = DoubleToSignal(qPrevSignal);
               if(m_isTrainQueuePrimary[m_isTrainCursor] && (qPred == Buy || qPred == Sell))
                 {
                  m_cumIsTotal++;
                  if(isHit)
                     m_cumIsCorrect++;
                 }
              }
            else
               if(qBuy && qSell)
                  dUndefine += (100 - dUndefine) / Net.recentAverageSmoothingFactor;
            TempData.Clear();
            if(m_outputNeuronsCount == 1)
               TempData.Add(qBuy && !qSell ? 1 : !qBuy && qSell ? -1 : 0);
            else
               if(m_outputNeuronsCount == 3)
                 {
                  TempData.Add(qBuy ? LABEL_SMOOTH_HIGH : LABEL_SMOOTH_LOW);
                  TempData.Add(qSell ? LABEL_SMOOTH_HIGH : LABEL_SMOOTH_LOW);
                  TempData.Add((!qBuy && !qSell) ? LABEL_SMOOTH_HIGH : LABEL_SMOOTH_LOW);
                 }
            // Per-slot weight from m_isTrainQueueWeightScale[m_isTrainCursor], decided once at queue
            // time in pass 1. Currently always 1.0: class imbalance is corrected analytically inside
            // the gradient by the logit-adjusted loss, so there is no per-sample reweighting left to
            // apply here at all. Kept as a real per-slot value rather than a literal 1.0 inline so a
            // future supplemental weight can be reintroduced without re-touching the queueing or
            // shuffle code.
            //--- FOCAL-LOSS MODULATION REMOVED 2026-07-31. It multiplied this weight by (1-pt)^gamma,
            //--- a second correction on the same axis as the logit adjustment - the stacking failure
            //--- Buda et al. 2018 describes and this file already cited in two other places. It was
            //--- running at an eighth strength (gamma * 0.125), damped by the replay toggle, for a
            //--- replay path that the adjusted loss had already switched off - so the damping was
            //--- calibrated against a mechanism that was not running. See the class-imbalance audit in
            //--- Variables\Inputs.mqh.
            double qSampleWeight = m_isTrainQueueWeightScale[m_isTrainCursor];
            Net.backProp(TempData, qSampleWeight);
           }
         if(m_isTrainCursor + 1 < m_isTrainQueueCount && GetTickCount() - chunkStartTick >= TRAIN_TIME_BUDGET_MS)
           {
            //--- yield: save enough to resume PASS 2 mid-queue on the next call - m_isPass2Active
            //--- and m_isTrainCursor (both members) carry the actual resume position; bars/oosCutoff/
            //--- add_loop are stashed the same way pass 1 already does, since era-end logic just
            //--- below still needs them once pass 2 finishes.
            m_resumeBars = bars;
            m_resumeTotalIter = totalIter;
            m_resumeOosCutoff = oosCutoff;
            m_resumeAddLoop = add_loop;
            m_resumeBarIndex = i;
            m_eraResumePending = true;
            m_modelEta = eta;
            return;
           }
        }
      m_isPass2Active = false;
      m_isPass2Done = true;
     }
   //--- Pass 3: OOS scoring, chronological, AFTER pass 2 has actually trained on this era's IS data -
   //--- see m_isPass3Active's declaration comment for why this can no longer happen inline during
   //--- pass 1's scan.
   if(!stop && add_loop)
     {
      if(!m_isPass3Active)
        {
         m_isPass3Active = true;
         m_oosScoreStartIndex = (int)MathMin(oosCutoff - 1, bars - MathMax(m_historyBars, 0) - 2);
         m_oosScoreIndex = m_oosScoreStartIndex;
         for(int rn = 0; rn < 3; rn++)
           {
            m_oosOutMin[rn] = DBL_MAX;
            m_oosOutMax[rn] = -DBL_MAX;
           }
         m_oosOutSpreadSum = 0.0;
         m_oosOutCount = 0;
        }
      for(; m_oosScoreIndex >= 2; m_oosScoreIndex--)
        {
         int oi = m_oosScoreIndex;
         if(!(oi < (int)(bars - MathMax(m_historyBars, 0) - 1) && m_Time.GetData(oi) > dtStudied))
            continue;
         bool oWindowOk = BuildFeatureWindow(oi);
         //--- Same guard as pass 2, and it matters more here: OOS accuracy is what checkpoint selection
         //--- and the plateau ladder's auto-deploy both rank on, so scoring a stale forward pass would
         //--- not just be wrong, it would be wrong in the one number that decides which model ships.
         //--- A skipped bar simply isn't counted; it never becomes a hit or a miss.
         bool oForwardOk = (oWindowOk && TempData.Total() >= (int)m_historyBars * m_neuronsCount &&
                            Net.feedForward(TempData));
         if(oWindowOk && !oForwardOk && !forwardFailureReported)
           {
            forwardFailureReported = true;
            Print(__FUNCTION__ + ": CNet::feedForward FAILED during OOS scoring at era " +
                  IntegerToString((int)m_eraCount) + " - affected bars are excluded from the OOS"
                  " accuracy rather than scored against a stale prediction.");
           }
         if(oForwardOk)
           {
            Net.getResults(TempData);
            // Raw output stats MUST be captured here, before ApplyClassificationSoftmax() overwrites
            // TempData[0..2] in place with the softmax probabilities - see m_oosOutMin's declaration
            // comment for what these feed.
            if(m_outputNeuronsCount == 3 && TempData.Total() >= 3)
              {
               double rawHi = -DBL_MAX, rawLo = DBL_MAX;
               for(int rn = 0; rn < 3; rn++)
                 {
                  double rv = TempData.At(rn);
                  if(rv < m_oosOutMin[rn])
                     m_oosOutMin[rn] = rv;
                  if(rv > m_oosOutMax[rn])
                     m_oosOutMax[rn] = rv;
                  rawHi = MathMax(rawHi, rv);
                  rawLo = MathMin(rawLo, rv);
                 }
               m_oosOutSpreadSum += rawHi - rawLo;
               m_oosOutCount++;
              }
            double oPrevSignal = (m_outputNeuronsCount == 3) ? ApplyClassificationSoftmax() : TempData[0];
            double oDeploySignal = oPrevSignal;
            if(m_outputNeuronsCount == 3)
               oDeploySignal = AdjustedSignalFromSoftmax();
            double oNeuron0 = (TempData.Total() > 0) ? TempData[0] : 0.0;
            double oNeuron1 = (TempData.Total() > 1) ? TempData[1] : 0.0;
            double oNeuron2 = (TempData.Total() > 2) ? TempData[2] : 0.0;
            bool oBuy = m_labelCacheHasValue[oi] ? m_labelCacheBuy[oi] : false;
            bool oSell = m_labelCacheHasValue[oi] ? m_labelCacheSell[oi] : false;
            ENUM_SIGNAL oTrueSignal = oBuy ? Buy : (oSell ? Sell : Neutral);
            UpdateTrainingStatusLabel(
               StringFormat("Scoring OOS bar %d of %d -> %.2f%% (post-training)", m_oosScoreStartIndex - m_oosScoreIndex + 1, m_oosScoreStartIndex + 1,
                             (double)(m_oosScoreStartIndex - m_oosScoreIndex + 1.0) / MathMax(m_oosScoreStartIndex + 1, 1) * 100),
               oNeuron0, oNeuron1, oNeuron2, oDeploySignal);
            // Held-out bar: score the model's freshly-trained-this-era forecast against the actual
            // outcome without learning from it - keeps the OOS accuracy an honest overfitting signal.
            bool oClassified = (DoubleToSignal(oPrevSignal) == Buy || DoubleToSignal(oPrevSignal) == Sell || DoubleToSignal(oPrevSignal) == Neutral);
            if(oClassified)
              {
               m_oosSamples++;
               m_oosConfidenceSum += MathAbs(oPrevSignal);
               if(dOosError < 0)
                  dOosError = 0;
               bool hit = (DoubleToSignal(oPrevSignal) == oTrueSignal);
               //--- Compounded, persistent DIRECTIONAL win-rate: count only bars the model actually called
               //--- Buy or Sell (Neutral "no trade" calls aren't wins or losses), so this reflects the
               //--- accuracy of its directional signals, not the Neutral-inflated all-class rate.
               ENUM_SIGNAL oPred = DoubleToSignal(oPrevSignal);
               if(oPred == Buy || oPred == Sell)
                 {
                  m_cumOosTotal++;
                  if(hit)
                     m_cumOosCorrect++;
                 }
               // Per-class confusion counts, used for the Buy/Sell recall convergence gate below
               switch(oTrueSignal)
                 {
                  case Buy:
                     m_oosBuyTotal++;
                     if(hit)
                        m_oosBuyHits++;
                     break;
                  case Sell:
                     m_oosSellTotal++;
                     if(hit)
                        m_oosSellHits++;
                     break;
                  default:
                     m_oosNeutralTotal++;
                     if(hit)
                        m_oosNeutralHits++;
                     break;
                 }
               // Same confusion counts keyed by what the model actually PREDICTED this bar, not the
               // true label - see m_oosBuyPredicted's declaration comment for why recall alone can
               // hide an over-firing class.
               switch(DoubleToSignal(oPrevSignal))
                 {
                  case Buy:
                     m_oosBuyPredicted++;
                     if(hit)
                        m_oosBuyPredictedHits++;
                     break;
                  case Sell:
                     m_oosSellPredicted++;
                     if(hit)
                        m_oosSellPredictedHits++;
                     break;
                  default:
                     m_oosNeutralPredicted++;
                     if(hit)
                        m_oosNeutralPredictedHits++;
                     break;
                 }
               // Live-decision precision: scores the bars on which the deployed EA would actually cast a
               // directional vote, using the prior-corrected (logit-adjusted) posterior - see
               // AdjustedSignalFromSoftmax()/RefreshLatestSignal(). The recall/argmax-precision above stay
               // on the raw argmax (the model's intrinsic class separation, which the convergence gate
               // needs); THIS scores what trades live, so the panel's live precision number is the
               // precision a buyer gets forward. TempData still holds this bar's raw softmax probs
               // (nothing overwrote them since ApplyClassificationSoftmax above), so the adjustment reads
               // them directly. Neutral picks aren't counted - they cast no vote.
               // No confidence-floor term any more: with the floor removed, EVERY non-Neutral adjusted
               // decision casts a vote (at its tier weight), so any threshold here would score a
               // different population than the one that actually votes. Whether a given vote goes on to
               // OPEN a position additionally depends on Min_Vote_Open versus the AVERAGE across all
               // voting filters, which this per-bar training-time scorer has no visibility of - so this
               // stays the honest "would have voted, and was it right" measure rather than pretending to
               // model the aggregate.
               if(m_outputNeuronsCount == 3)
                 {
                  double adjSig = AdjustedSignalFromSoftmax();
                  ENUM_SIGNAL adjEnum = DoubleToSignal(adjSig);
                  if(adjEnum != Neutral)
                    {
                     bool fireHit = (adjEnum == oTrueSignal);
                     //--- Bucket the same fire by confidence tier - see m_oosTierFired. Safe to call here
                     //--- and nowhere earlier: ConfidenceTier() reads the net's CURRENT outputs, which is
                     //--- exactly the bar AdjustedSignalFromSoftmax() just scored.
                     int fireTier = ConfidenceTier();
                     if(fireTier >= 0 && fireTier < 4)
                       {
                        m_oosTierFired[fireTier]++;
                        if(fireHit)
                           m_oosTierHits[fireTier]++;
                       }
                     if(adjEnum == Buy)
                       {
                        m_oosBuyFired++;
                        if(fireHit)
                           m_oosBuyFiredHits++;
                       }
                     else
                       {
                        m_oosSellFired++;
                        if(fireHit)
                           m_oosSellFiredHits++;
                       }
                    }
                 }
               if(hit)
                 {
                  dOosForecast += (100 - dOosForecast) / Net.recentAverageSmoothingFactor;
                  dOosError -= dOosError / Net.recentAverageSmoothingFactor;
                 }
               else
                 {
                  dOosForecast -= dOosForecast / Net.recentAverageSmoothingFactor;
                  dOosError += (100 - dOosError) / Net.recentAverageSmoothingFactor;
                 }
              }
            // Mirror pass 1's chart annotation for this (OOS) bar, now using post-training weights
            // instead of pass 1's pre-training snapshot - last write wins on the shared per-bar-time
            // object, so this supersedes pass 1's earlier draw for the same bar with the correct one.
            m_lastBarTime = m_Time.GetData(oi);
            if(oi > 0)
              {
               // NMS on: record only (the era-end sweep renders); off: draw inline. See pass 1's note.
               if(m_signalClusterWindow > 0)
                 {
                  if(oi < ArraySize(m_arrowSignalCache))
                     m_arrowSignalCache[oi] = oDeploySignal;
                 }
               else
                  if(DoubleToSignal(oDeploySignal) == Neutral)
                     DeleteObject(m_lastBarTime);
                  else
                     DrawObject(m_lastBarTime, oDeploySignal, m_High.GetData(oi), m_Low.GetData(oi));
              }
           }
         if(m_oosScoreIndex - 1 >= 2 && GetTickCount() - chunkStartTick >= TRAIN_TIME_BUDGET_MS)
           {
            //--- yield: save enough to resume PASS 3 mid-walk on the next call - m_isPass3Active and
            //--- m_oosScoreIndex (both members) carry the actual resume position.
            m_resumeBars = bars;
            m_resumeTotalIter = totalIter;
            m_resumeOosCutoff = oosCutoff;
            m_resumeAddLoop = add_loop;
            m_resumeBarIndex = i;
            m_eraResumePending = true;
            m_modelEta = eta;
            return;
           }
        }
      m_isPass3Active = false;
      //--- Pass 3 done => every scored bar's prediction is now in m_arrowSignalCache. Collapse each
      //--- same-direction cluster to its earliest bar so the chart shows one arrow per real turn.
      PruneDirectionalClusters(bars);
     }
      //--- Diagnostic recall snapshot for the periodic progress log further below - populated inside
      //--- the m_oosSamples>0 recall-gate block when this era actually computes it; stays -1 ("n/a"
      //--- in the log) on eras that don't (era 0, or a stopped/cap-hit era).
      int logBuyRecallPct = -1, logSellRecallPct = -1, logNeutralRecallPct = -1;
      //--- Balanced accuracy (macro-recall) this era, surfaced in the log so the metric the checkpoint
      //--- is now selected on is visible - see m_bestBalancedOos. -1 ("n/a") on eras that don't score.
      int logBalancedAccPct = -1;
      int logCoveragePct = -1;
      int logDirPrecPct = -1;
      //--- Zero-skill precision for this era's label mix - see chancePrecPct. Logged beside the selection
      //--- score because the raw precision number is meaningless without it: 44% is excellent against a
      //--- 3% chance level and worthless against a 43% one, and the whole 2026-08-01 confusion was
      //--- reading the first as if it were the second.
      int logChancePrecPct = -1;
      //--- Predicted-rate (of all OOS bars this era, how often the model called this class at all) and
      //--- precision (of the calls it made, how many were right) for Buy/Sell - m_oosBuyPredicted/
      //--- m_oosSellPredicted (see that member's declaration comment) were already being tracked for
      //--- exactly this but never surfaced anywhere. A recall-only view can't tell "the model never once
      //--- calls Sell" (predicted rate stuck at 0%) apart from "the model calls Sell plenty but always on
      //--- the wrong bars" (predicted rate healthy, precision near 0%) - both show up identically as 0%
      //--- Sell recall, but point at completely different problems (a suppressed/dead output vs. a
      //--- miscalibrated decision boundary), so this splits them out.
      int logBuyPredPct = -1, logSellPredPct = -1, logBuyPrecPct = -1, logSellPrecPct = -1;
      //--- Live-fired precision (%) per direction this era - the precision on just the bars that cleared
      //--- the confidence floor under the live/prior-corrected decision, i.e. what would actually trade.
      int logBuyFiredPrecPct = -1, logSellFiredPrecPct = -1;
      bool shouldLogProgress = false;
      //--- era complete (ran out of bars) or a stop was requested mid-era
      if(add_loop)
        {
         m_eraCount++;
         m_erasSinceCooldown++;
         //--- EMA shadow-weight deployment: blend the shadow a small step (SHADOW_WEIGHT_TAU) toward
         //--- Net's just-updated weights, every era - see m_shadowNet's declaration comment. Must run
         //--- here, inside the era loop, not just once at Train()-end: the whole point is damping the
         //--- WITHIN-run oscillation (era-to-era whipsaw), which a single end-of-run blend would miss
         //--- entirely.
         EnsureShadowNet();
         if(CheckPointer(m_shadowNet) != POINTER_INVALID)
            m_shadowNet.BlendWeightsFrom(Net, SHADOW_WEIGHT_TAU);
         //--- Status-label progress is invisible with no chart (headless/optimization runs), and even in
         //--- visual mode a long training run can otherwise look "stuck" for a long time with no
         //--- Journal output at all - log progress at most every ~5s (real wall-clock, not simulated
         //--- time) so an operator can tell it's actively working, not hung. The actual Print() is
         //--- deferred past the recall-gate block below (see logBuyRecallPct etc.) so this line can
         //--- show per-class OOS recall - once OOS accuracy alone clears the target, recall is the
         //--- most common thing still silently blocking convergence, and previously had no visibility
         //--- outside of a regression event.
         static uint lastProgressLogTick = 0;
         uint nowTick = GetTickCount();
         shouldLogProgress = (nowTick - lastProgressLogTick >= 5000);
         if(shouldLogProgress)
            lastProgressLogTick = nowTick;
         //--- Era cap. There used to be a second, much smaller cap here for throwaway auto-tune
         //--- candidates; the filter tuner does not train candidates at all, so only the real one remains.
         int effectiveEraCap = m_maxErasPerRun;
         //--- PLATEAU LADDER, terminal stage: training stopped improving and both escape attempts (two
         //--- learning-rate warm restarts) failed to find anything better - see the ladder in the era-end block
         //--- below, which is what raised m_plateauStage this far and already logged why. This is the
         //--- normal, expected way a run finishes now that there is no absolute accuracy target to hit:
         //--- it trains until it genuinely stops getting better, then deploys its best checkpoint.
         //--- Same mechanism as the operator's "No" answer at the era cap (see that branch's comments for
         //--- why m_trainingComplete is set here and why m_trainingStopRequested deliberately is NOT):
         //--- stop ends this era loop, FinalizeTrainRun() then restores and deploys the best checkpoint.
         if(m_plateauStage >= PLATEAU_STAGE_DEPLOY && m_bestPassedRecall && m_haveOosCheckpoint)
           {
            stop = true;
            m_trainingComplete = true;
           }
         else if(effectiveEraCap > 0 && m_erasSinceCooldown >= effectiveEraCap)
           {
            //--- Era cap reached without converging: ask the operator whether to keep training or
            //--- deploy the best checkpoint and stop (see PromptContinuePastEraCap / m_maxErasPerRun).
            if(PromptContinuePastEraCap(dOosForecast))
              {
               m_erasSinceCooldown = 0; // keep training - reset the cap window
               Print(ID + ": hit the " + IntegerToString(m_maxErasPerRun) + "-era cap (best dir-precision " + DoubleToString(m_bestBalancedOos, 1) + "%, blended OOS " + DoubleToString(dOosForecast, 1) + "%) - CONTINUING training by operator choice.");
              }
            else
              {
               //--- stop: end THIS era loop now; FinalizeTrainRun (reached via the stop path below,
               //--- because stop==true) deploys the best checkpoint. Deliberately do NOT set
               //--- m_trainingStopRequested here: m_trainingComplete alone already routes every later
               //--- tick to RefreshConvergedSignal (see ScheduleTrainingIfNeeded's if-branch precedence),
               //--- so training never re-arms - and leaving m_trainingStopRequested false lets the deployed
               //--- model run live inference AND online continual learning IN-SESSION, exactly like a
               //--- normal-convergence deploy (which never sets it either). A panel Stop (StopTraining())
               //--- still sets it and halts everything, including online learning - that distinction is
               //--- preserved. See OnlineLearnStep()'s gate.
               stop = true;
               //--- Operator DELIBERATELY chose to deploy this best checkpoint as the final model. That's a
               //--- terminal decision and must be PERSISTED as such: mark it complete so a later reload
               //--- (chart restart OR strategy tester) runs inference instead of silently resuming a full
               //--- training run. This is the terminal-deploy path; a mid-training Stop click
               //--- (StopTraining()) leaves m_trainingComplete false on purpose so that genuinely-
               //--- interrupted run does resume. Note the m_trainingComplete=(m_objectiveMet&&m_oosStable)
               //--- line below is inside if(!stop), so it can't clobber this back to false on this path.
               m_trainingComplete = true;
               Print(ID + ": hit the " + IntegerToString(m_maxErasPerRun) + "-era cap before the plateau ladder finished (best dir-precision " + DoubleToString(m_bestBalancedOos, 1) + "%, blended OOS " + DoubleToString(dOosForecast, 1) + "%) - operator chose to DEPLOY the best checkpoint as final (marked complete; reloads will run inference, not retrain). Reaching this cap now means the run was still finding new bests, or never cleared the per-class recall floor (need >=" + IntegerToString(m_minDirectionalRecallPct) + "% each) - raise the era cap for the former, relax MinRecall/SwingConfirmationBars for the latter.");
              }
           }
        }
      if(!stop)
        {
         dError = Net.getRecentAverageError();
         if(add_loop)
           {
            if(m_oosSamples > 0)
              {
               // Confidence calibration (classification head only - see m_confidenceCalScale's
               // declaration comment): compare this era's actual OOS accuracy against the average
               // confidence magnitude the model claimed, EMA-blend the resulting scale into
               // m_confidenceCalScale so SignedAIConfidence() reports something closer to a real
               // probability instead of the raw, uncalibrated softmax value.
               if(m_outputNeuronsCount == 3 && m_oosConfidenceSum > 0.0)
                 {
                  double empiricalAccuracy = (double)(m_oosBuyHits + m_oosSellHits + m_oosNeutralHits) / m_oosSamples;
                  double avgClaimedConfidence = m_oosConfidenceSum / m_oosSamples;
                  double eraScale = MathMax(0.3, MathMin(1.5, empiricalAccuracy / avgClaimedConfidence));
                  m_confidenceCalScale += (eraScale - m_confidenceCalScale) / Net.recentAverageSmoothingFactor;
                 }
               // Per-class recall gate, symmetric across all three classes: a model that "wins" on
               // blended dOosForecast purely by calling everything Neutral (or, just as biased, by
               // over-calling Buy/Sell at Neutral's expense) would still pass a plain accuracy check -
               // require Buy, Sell, AND Neutral OOS recall to each individually clear
               // m_minDirectionalRecallPct so the network can't converge while biased toward any one
               // output. A class with FEWER than MIN_OOS_CLASS_SAMPLES_FOR_GATE true OOS samples this
               // era doesn't block (recallPct == -1 => treated as passing) so a thin OOS window doesn't
               // deadlock convergence early in a run. Computed BEFORE the checkpoint/eta-decay block
               // below (not just the final m_objectiveMet gate) so "best" ranking is recall-aware too -
               // see isBetterEra's comment for why that matters.
               //
               // The threshold matters: a bare ">0" here (the original behavior) let a run converge at
               // era 44-46 with the OOS window containing exactly ZERO true Buy/Sell bars that era
               // (logged as "OOS recall Buy:n/a Sell:n/a Neutral:100%") - a full Neutral-only collapse
               // that the gate waved through because there was nothing to measure recall against, not
               // because the model was actually unbiased. Requiring a real minimum sample count means
               // an unlucky/thin OOS slice blocks convergence instead of silently passing it.
               int buyRecallPct = (m_oosBuyTotal >= MIN_OOS_CLASS_SAMPLES_FOR_GATE) ? (int)MathRound(100.0 * m_oosBuyHits / m_oosBuyTotal) : -1;
               int sellRecallPct = (m_oosSellTotal >= MIN_OOS_CLASS_SAMPLES_FOR_GATE) ? (int)MathRound(100.0 * m_oosSellHits / m_oosSellTotal) : -1;
               int neutralRecallPct = (m_oosNeutralTotal >= MIN_OOS_CLASS_SAMPLES_FOR_GATE) ? (int)MathRound(100.0 * m_oosNeutralHits / m_oosNeutralTotal) : -1;
               logBuyRecallPct = buyRecallPct;
               logSellRecallPct = sellRecallPct;
               logNeutralRecallPct = neutralRecallPct;
               m_lastBuyRecallPct = buyRecallPct;
               m_lastSellRecallPct = sellRecallPct;
               // Predicted-rate (share of ALL OOS bars this era the model called this class, regardless
               // of whether that call was right) and precision (of just those calls, how many were
               // right) - see logBuyPredPct's declaration comment above for why this is worth logging
               // alongside recall. Denominator is the per-era OOS bar count (sum of the per-class true
               // totals, all tallied in the same pass-3 block and reset together each era) - NOT
               // m_oosSamples, which only resets on a full model reset and so accumulates across every
               // era of the run: dividing this era's calls by that all-run total diluted the logged
               // rate by roughly the era number (observed: era-15 "Buy:2%" that was really ~30%),
               // making a genuinely directional model read as a nearly-dead output.
               int oosEraBars = m_oosBuyTotal + m_oosSellTotal + m_oosNeutralTotal;
               logBuyPredPct = (oosEraBars > 0) ? (int)MathRound(100.0 * m_oosBuyPredicted / oosEraBars) : -1;
               logSellPredPct = (oosEraBars > 0) ? (int)MathRound(100.0 * m_oosSellPredicted / oosEraBars) : -1;
               logBuyPrecPct = (m_oosBuyPredicted > 0) ? (int)MathRound(100.0 * m_oosBuyPredictedHits / m_oosBuyPredicted) : -1;
               logSellPrecPct = (m_oosSellPredicted > 0) ? (int)MathRound(100.0 * m_oosSellPredictedHits / m_oosSellPredicted) : -1;
               //--- Live-fired precision (what actually trades - see m_oosBuyFired): of the directional
               //--- calls that cleared the confidence floor under the live/prior-corrected rule this era,
               //--- how many were right. Cached for the panel/log; -1 = the model fired none this era.
               logBuyFiredPrecPct = (m_oosBuyFired > 0) ? (int)MathRound(100.0 * m_oosBuyFiredHits / m_oosBuyFired) : -1;
               logSellFiredPrecPct = (m_oosSellFired > 0) ? (int)MathRound(100.0 * m_oosSellFiredHits / m_oosSellFired) : -1;
               m_lastBuyFiredPrecPct = logBuyFiredPrecPct;
               m_lastSellFiredPrecPct = logSellFiredPrecPct;
               m_lastBuyFired = m_oosBuyFired;
               m_lastSellFired = m_oosSellFired;
               //--- SELECTION METRIC. Ranking moved off balanced accuracy (macro-recall) 2026-07-30
               //--- because that metric is maximized by exactly the model this system must never deploy.
               //--- Measured frontier at a fixed signal strength, base rate 6.1%:
               //---     tau 0.00 -> calls  0.2% of bars at 27.3% precision, balanced 34.0%
               //---     tau 0.35 -> calls  2.0% of bars at 15.5% precision, balanced 36.3%
               //---     tau 1.00 -> calls 49.6% of bars at  6.4% precision, balanced 53.5%
               //--- Balanced accuracy rises monotonically as the model calls MORE and is right LESS,
               //--- because two of its three terms are directional recalls that a call-everything model
               //--- drives to ~95% while the Neutral term it sacrifices counts for only a third. The
               //--- 2026-07-29 run landed exactly there: balanced 58-64% while calling a direction on
               //--- ~100% of bars at a 5-7% win rate against a ~6% base rate - no information at all.
               //--- Only the per-class recall floor stopped those from deploying, i.e. a guard was doing
               //--- the job the objective should have been doing, and the same guard also rejected the
               //--- genuinely useful sparse-but-precise checkpoints (directional recall 4-6%).
               //--- Ranking is now DIRECTIONAL PRECISION - of the bars this model called Buy or Sell,
               //--- how many were right - which is what a trading edge actually is. Two anti-degenerate
               //--- floors bracket it, because precision alone is trivially maximized by calling almost
               //--- nothing: coverage must reach a fraction of the true base rate, and precision must at
               //--- least beat that base rate (a model no better than the coin is not an edge).
               int oosDirCalls = m_oosBuyPredicted + m_oosSellPredicted;
               int oosDirHits  = m_oosBuyPredictedHits + m_oosSellPredictedHits;
               int oosDirTrue  = m_oosBuyTotal + m_oosSellTotal;
               bool coverageMeasurable = (oosEraBars > 0 && oosDirTrue > 0);
               double coveragePct   = coverageMeasurable ? 100.0 * oosDirCalls / oosEraBars : -1.0;
               double baseRatePct   = coverageMeasurable ? 100.0 * oosDirTrue  / oosEraBars : -1.0;
               double dirPrecPct    = (oosDirCalls > 0)  ? 100.0 * oosDirHits  / oosDirCalls : -1.0;
               double minCoveragePct = coverageMeasurable ? baseRatePct * MIN_COVERAGE_FRACTION_OF_BASE_RATE : -1.0;
               //--- ZERO-SKILL PRECISION: what a model with no information scores on this metric, by
               //--- always calling whichever direction is more common. Its precision is that class's
               //--- share of ALL bars, because the bars it calls are uncorrelated with the labels.
               //--- This REPLACED `dirPrecPct >= baseRatePct` on 2026-08-01, which was wrong the moment
               //--- the labels stopped being rare. baseRatePct is Buy+Sell as a share of all bars: at the
               //--- old exact-pivot target that was ~6%, so "beat the base rate" read as "beat chance"
               //--- and the test looked sound. Triple-barrier labels put it at ~83%, and the gate then
               //--- demanded 83% directional precision - unreachable by construction, so NOTHING could
               //--- ever deploy. Observed live: all four topologies cycling "PLATEAU stage 3 ... nothing
               //--- safe to deploy" at a genuinely healthy 43-45% precision.
               //--- max(Buy,Sell) is the right benchmark at ANY base rate: it is exactly the score of the
               //--- degenerate always-call-one-direction model this floor exists to reject, and it
               //--- degrades correctly to ~3% on the old rare-pivot labels.
               double chancePrecPct = coverageMeasurable
                                      ? 100.0 * MathMax(m_oosBuyTotal, m_oosSellTotal) / oosEraBars : -1.0;
               logCoveragePct = (int)MathRound(coveragePct);
               logDirPrecPct  = (int)MathRound(dirPrecPct);
               logChancePrecPct = (chancePrecPct >= 0.0) ? (int)MathRound(chancePrecPct) : -1;
               //--- Deployability. Replaces the per-class recall floor as the gate the checkpoint
               //--- selection and the plateau ladder's "is there anything safe to deploy" test read.
               //--- MinRecall still drives the diagnostic recall line below, but no longer decides what
               //--- ships - it is the input that produced the catch-22 where nothing ever qualified.
               //--- The margin is not arbitrary and not a knob: beating chance by any amount at all is a
               //--- coin-flip result once the estimate's own sampling error is accounted for. With
               //--- oosDirCalls directional calls at a chance rate p, the standard error of the measured
               //--- precision is sqrt(p(1-p)/n) - about 0.4pp at the ~11,000 calls these runs produce - so
               //--- `dirPrecPct > chancePrecPct` was passing models whose entire "edge" was under one
               //--- sigma. Observed 2026-08-01: the perceptron deployed at edge +0pp.
               //--- Requiring EDGE_MIN_SIGMAS standard errors instead scales the bar with the evidence:
               //--- a sparse model needs a bigger measured edge to qualify than a dense one, which is
               //--- exactly right, and no constant has to be re-tuned when coverage changes.
               double chanceP = (chancePrecPct >= 0.0) ? chancePrecPct / 100.0 : 0.0;
               double precSE  = (oosDirCalls > 0 && chanceP > 0.0 && chanceP < 1.0)
                                ? 100.0 * MathSqrt(chanceP * (1.0 - chanceP) / oosDirCalls) : 0.0;
               double edgeFloorPct = chancePrecPct + EDGE_MIN_SIGMAS * precSE;
               bool tradeableOK = coverageMeasurable && dirPrecPct >= 0.0 &&
                                  coveragePct >= minCoveragePct && dirPrecPct > edgeFloorPct;
               //--- Ranking key: precision, DISCOUNTED by how far short of the coverage floor the era
               //--- fell. Raw precision was wrong here and the 2026-07-30 run caught it within 8 eras -
               //--- HYBRID made exactly ONE directional call, got it right, scored 100%, and locked that
               //--- in as best-ever. Nothing can beat 100%, so the checkpoint was frozen on a single
               //--- sample and the run could only burn to the era cap. The coverage floor was already
               //--- computed and already blocked that era from being DEPLOYABLE, but the ranking ignored
               //--- it whenever no era had qualified yet - which is exactly the phase this matters in.
               //--- Discounting rather than thresholding keeps the ordering continuous: an era at half
               //--- the floor scores half its precision, so more coverage and better precision both
               //--- improve rank and neither can be traded away entirely. Above the floor the credit
               //--- saturates at 1.0, so ranking among genuinely deployable eras stays pure precision.
               double coverageCredit = 1.0;
               if(minCoveragePct > 0.0 && coveragePct >= 0.0)
                  coverageCredit = MathMin(1.0, coveragePct / minCoveragePct);
               double selectionScore = (dirPrecPct >= 0.0) ? dirPrecPct * coverageCredit : 0.0;
               bool directionalRecallOK = (buyRecallPct < 0 || buyRecallPct >= m_minDirectionalRecallPct) &&
                                          (sellRecallPct < 0 || sellRecallPct >= m_minDirectionalRecallPct) &&
                                          (neutralRecallPct < 0 || neutralRecallPct >= m_minDirectionalRecallPct);
               // Balanced accuracy (macro-recall): the mean of the three per-class recalls - the metric
               // the checkpoint SELECTION ranks on (see m_bestBalancedOos). Unlike blended accuracy it
               // weights Buy, Sell and Neutral equally, so it can't be inflated by the ~96%-Neutral base
               // rate. Computed from the same raw per-era recalls the floor uses (not smoothed - the
               // whole recall-driven side of this block is per-era-raw by design). When a directional
               // class is thin/unmeasured this era (recall -1), balanced accuracy isn't meaningful, so
               // fall back to the blended dOosForecast for ranking that era (prior behavior) rather than
               // averaging a partial set - the recall floor + directionalRecallMeasured still guard the
               // actual convergence decision separately.
               double balancedOosEra = (buyRecallPct >= 0 && sellRecallPct >= 0 && neutralRecallPct >= 0)
                                       ? (buyRecallPct + sellRecallPct + neutralRecallPct) / 3.0
                                       : dOosForecast;
               logBalancedAccPct = (buyRecallPct >= 0 && sellRecallPct >= 0 && neutralRecallPct >= 0)
                                   ? (int)MathRound(balancedOosEra) : -1;
               // A real (non-thin-sample, i.e. not the -1 "n/a" sentinel) 0% recall on any class means
               // the model never once got that class right this era - a majority-class collapse
               // (predict-everything-Neutral, or symmetrically a Buy/Sell-only collapse), not progress
               // toward separating classes. Before any era has ever passed the recall floor,
               // isBetterEra's fallback below is a pure blended-accuracy tiebreak, and blended accuracy
               // is trivially maximized by collapsing to the majority class. Observed in practice
               // (2026-07-19, SP500 H4): once a run landed on a 0%/0%/100% Buy/Sell/Neutral era, its
               // accuracy kept creeping upward for 124 STRAIGHT eras purely from sharpening the
               // Neutral-vs-everything boundary - each tick registered as a "new best", re-anchoring the
               // checkpoint AND bumping eta back toward its ceiling (the recovery bump below), actively
               // rewarding the collapse instead of remaining neutral to it. Excluding these eras from
               // isBetterEra denies them that anchor/reward without touching the restore/decay branch
               // below, which stays exactly as gated on m_bestPassedRecall as before - see that block's
               // own comment for why loosening THAT part pre-pass caused a worse failure historically.
               //--- Under precision ranking the degenerate era is the one that called NOTHING
               //--- directional (precision undefined, nothing to trade), not one whose per-class
               //--- recall touched zero - a sparse high-precision model legitimately has low recall.
               bool isFullyCollapsedEra = (oosDirCalls <= 0);
               // Lexicographic "better than the best-so-far" ordering: passing the directional recall
               // floor always outranks not passing it, regardless of blended dOosForecast; only WITHIN
               // the same pass/fail category does blended accuracy break the tie. Without this, an era
               // that traded a few "safe" Neutral calls for genuinely useful (recall-improving) Buy/Sell
               // calls would look like a regression in blended-accuracy-only terms and get its
               // checkpoint skipped / learning rate cut - fighting directly against the network learning
               // to call Buy/Sell at all, since Neutral is the large majority class (~80%+ of labels) and
               // a model that just calls everything Neutral already scores well on blended accuracy
               // alone. isWorseEra mirrors the same ordering for the eta-decay-on-regression trigger.
               // (directionalRecallOK implies !isFullyCollapsedEra already, since the floor is always
               // >0%, so the first clause below needs no extra guard - only the pre-pass accuracy-only
               // tiebreak in the second clause does.)
               // Within the same recall-pass category the tie now breaks on BALANCED accuracy, not the
               // Neutral-dominated blended dOosForecast - see m_bestBalancedOos. This is what deploys the
               // most class-balanced era instead of the most Neutral-leaning one, and it also strengthens
               // the pre-pass phase: a Neutral-only era scores (0+0+N)/3 in balanced terms (low) rather
               // than the ~80% it scores in blended terms, so it can no longer re-anchor the checkpoint.
               //--- tradeableOK / selectionScore, not directionalRecallOK / balancedOosEra - see the
               //--- SELECTION METRIC note above. The lexicographic shape is unchanged: qualifying
               //--- always outranks not qualifying, and the score only breaks ties within a category.
               bool isBetterEra = (tradeableOK && !m_bestPassedRecall) ||
                                  (tradeableOK == m_bestPassedRecall && !isFullyCollapsedEra && selectionScore > m_bestBalancedOos);
               // The recall-pass-loss clause used to fire on ANY drop out of a full 3-way recall pass,
               // even a near-miss on one class at unchanged accuracy (e.g. observed: Buy:56% Sell:41%
               // Neutral:34% - Neutral alone missing the 40% floor by a few points) - treating that
               // identically to a total collapse back to Neutral-only. With three classes all needing
               // to simultaneously clear the floor, that made isWorseEra fire on most eras once a pass
               // was ever achieved, ratcheting eta toward ETA_MIN within a handful of eras and then
               // (before the recovery bump below existed) leaving it stuck there permanently - visible
               // in practice as ~25 back-to-back identical "regressed from best 70.6% to 70.6%" eras.
               // Now only counts as worse if accuracy ALSO dropped meaningfully (same threshold
               // regardless of whether the recall-pass flag changed too) - losing the recall-pass flag
               // at flat/improved accuracy is borderline variance, not a regression worth
               // restoring+decaying over.
               bool isWorseEra = selectionScore < m_bestBalancedOos - ETA_DECAY_REGRESSION_PCT;
               if(isBetterEra)
                 {
                  //--- Snapshot BOTH scores at the checkpoint: m_bestBalancedOos is what ranking compares
                  //--- against next era; m_bestOosForecast keeps the blended value FinalizeTrainRun() and
                  //--- the restore branch reset dOosForecast to (see m_bestBalancedOos' declaration).
                  m_bestOosForecast = dOosForecast;
                  m_bestBalancedOos = selectionScore;
                  m_bestPassedRecall = tradeableOK;
                  //--- eval candidates are throwaway - track the score (above) but never write a checkpoint
                  //--- file; m_haveOosCheckpoint=false then also skips the worse-era RestoreWeights() restore.
                  //--- In-MEMORY weight snapshot (not a file): the file-based checkpoint re-created every
                  //--- neuron on restore, which the CPU-DLL backend can't do for a second live set - see
                  //--- CNet::CaptureWeights/RestoreWeights. eval candidates snapshot nothing.
                  m_haveOosCheckpoint = Net.CaptureWeights();
                  // Recovery bump: ETA_DECAY_FACTOR-only ever shrinks eta, and previously nothing ever
                  // grew it back - a losing streak early in a run (even a since-corrected one) would
                  // permanently cap how fast every later era could learn for the rest of the run, all
                  // the way down to ETA_MIN with no way back. A genuinely better era (new best, not
                  // just a tie) means the current eta is working, so nudge it back up a bit - capped at
                  // this model's own configured starting rate (m_etaCeiling - AdamLearningRate for
                  // ADAM, SgdLearningRate for SGD, see that member's declaration comment) so this
                  // can't runaway past the rate training was actually tuned to start at.
                  eta = MathMin(m_etaCeiling, eta / ETA_DECAY_FACTOR);
                 }
               else
                  if(isWorseEra && m_bestOosForecast > 0)
                    {
                     // Decaying eta alone only softens FUTURE steps - it does nothing to undo the
                     // regression this era already baked into the weights, so a run could (and in
                     // practice did) spend 15+ eras compounding forward from one bad era's damage,
                     // each new era fighting the last one's overshoot instead of building on the best
                     // state found so far. Restore the last checkpointed-good weights before continuing
                     // (mirrors what FinalizeTrainRun() does at the END of a run, just applied live so
                     // the oscillation can't compound within a single run) - this is what actually turns
                     // "reduce LR on regression" into "step back, then retry slower", not just "drift
                     // slower".
                     //
                     // BOTH the restore AND the eta decay below are gated on m_bestPassedRecall: before
                     // ANY era has ever cleared the per-class recall floor, isBetterEra's own
                     // lexicographic ordering degrades to a pure blended-accuracy tiebreak
                     // (directionalRecallOK==false on both sides of the comparison), so "best checkpoint"
                     // during that phase just means "called Neutral most confidently so far" - restoring
                     // it would actively defend the majority-class collapse against any era that trades
                     // some accuracy for real Buy/Sell recall, which is exactly the bias this whole
                     // recall-gate mechanism exists to prevent (see isBetterEra's own comment above).
                     // Observed in practice: era 1-3 all "improved" on accuracy alone
                     // (24.9%->41.4%->52.3%) while Buy/Sell recall stayed at a flat 0% the entire time -
                     // restoring pre-pass would have locked training into that trajectory instead of
                     // letting it explore past it. Decaying eta has the same bias one step removed:
                     // every regression relative to a Neutral-collapse "best" shrinks eta a little more,
                     // steadily strangling the exploration needed to escape that collapse until eta
                     // bottoms out at ETA_MIN with no real solution ever found and no checkpoint to fall
                     // back on either - observed in practice as a run whose best-ever blended accuracy
                     // kept landing on 0%/0%/100% Buy/Sell/Neutral recall eras, each one triggering
                     // another decay on the very next era, until eta floored out around era 20 and the
                     // remaining eras just oscillated between collapse states with no way to make a
                     // large-enough move to escape and no way to reset. Once m_bestPassedRecall is true,
                     // there IS a genuinely good state worth protecting, and both restoring the
                     // checkpoint and decaying eta on regression are safe/correct again.
                     // 2026-07-29: the m_bestPassedRecall gate above has an escape now, because its
                     // stated premise expired. It was written when the pre-pass tiebreak really was
                     // blended-accuracy-only; the balanced-selection change (m_bestBalancedOos) replaced
                     // that with `balancedOosEra > m_bestBalancedOos` AND an isFullyCollapsedEra
                     // exclusion, so a Neutral-only era now scores ~33% (the FLOOR of the balanced
                     // metric) and cannot anchor the checkpoint at all. "Best checkpoint" pre-pass
                     // therefore no longer means "called Neutral most confidently" - it means "most
                     // class-balanced state found so far", which is worth defending, and isWorseEra is
                     // itself a balanced-accuracy regression, so it cannot fire merely for trading
                     // Neutral calls for Buy/Sell.
                     //
                     // Leaving the gate absolute had a failure mode of its own, and it is not
                     // hypothetical: if NO checkpoint ever clears the recall floor, m_bestPassedRecall
                     // stays false forever, so there is never any restore and never any eta decay.
                     // Observed on SP500 H1 2026-07-29 across three topologies - CONV ran 228 eras with
                     // eta pinned at its 0.000300 start while balanced accuracy slid 40% -> 35% and Buy
                     // recall 11% -> 2%. The run had no regression control whatsoever, and the plateau
                     // ladder could not end it either (stage 3 refuses to deploy without a recall pass),
                     // so it was a 1000-era one-way trip into a Neutral collapse.
                     //
                     // The original concern still applies while the best-so-far IS near-collapse:
                     // decaying eta against such a "best" strangles the exploration needed to escape it.
                     // So the escape is margin-guarded - defend the checkpoint only once it sits clearly
                     // above the one-class floor, which is exactly when there is something real to lose.
                     bool bestWorthDefending = (m_bestBalancedOos >
                                                BALANCED_COLLAPSE_PCT + BALANCED_WORTH_DEFENDING_MARGIN_PCT);
                     if(m_bestPassedRecall || bestWorthDefending)
                       {
                        if(m_haveOosCheckpoint && Net.RestoreWeights())
                           dOosForecast = m_bestOosForecast;
                        if(eta > ETA_MIN)
                           eta = MathMax(ETA_MIN, eta * ETA_DECAY_FACTOR);
                        Print(ID + ": OOS selection score (coverage-weighted dir-precision) regressed from best " + DoubleToString(m_bestBalancedOos, 1) +
                              "% to " + DoubleToString(selectionScore, 1) + "% (blended " + DoubleToString(m_bestOosForecast, 1) +
                              "%->" + DoubleToString(dOosForecast, 1) + "%) - restoring best checkpoint and decaying learning rate to " + DoubleToString(eta, 6));
                       }
                     else
                        Print(ID + ": OOS selection score (coverage-weighted dir-precision) regressed from best " + DoubleToString(m_bestBalancedOos, 1) +
                              "% to " + DoubleToString(selectionScore, 1) + "% (blended " + DoubleToString(m_bestOosForecast, 1) +
                              "%->" + DoubleToString(dOosForecast, 1) + "%) - best so far is still within " +
                              DoubleToString(BALANCED_WORTH_DEFENDING_MARGIN_PCT, 1) + "pp of the " +
                              DoubleToString(BALANCED_COLLAPSE_PCT, 1) + "% one-class floor, so there is nothing worth" +
                              " restoring yet - continuing to explore without decaying eta (still " + DoubleToString(eta, 6) + ")");
                    }
               //=== PLATEAU LADDER ====================================================================
               //--- Neither branch above fires in the dead zone between "new best" and "regressed by more
               //--- than ETA_DECAY_REGRESSION_PCT". This is the response to sitting in it: count eras since
               //--- the last new best and escalate. See the PLATEAU_* constants for the full rationale and
               if(isBetterEra)
                 {
                  //--- Moving again: retire the ladder. Deliberately does NOT undo the warm restart's
                  //--- raised eta - if the bigger step is what produced this new best, decaying it back
                  //--- would undo the very change that worked. The normal per-era eta schedule takes
                  //--- over from here.
                  if(m_plateauStage > 0)
                     Print(ID + ": new best selection score (coverage-weighted dir-precision) " + DoubleToString(m_bestBalancedOos, 1) +
                           "% - plateau escape worked, clearing plateau stage " + IntegerToString(m_plateauStage));
                  m_erasSinceBestBalanced = 0;
                  m_plateauStage = 0;
                 }
               else
                 {
                  m_erasSinceBestBalanced++;
                  int dueStage = m_erasSinceBestBalanced / PLATEAU_PATIENCE_ERAS;
                  if(dueStage > m_plateauStage)
                    {
                     m_plateauStage = dueStage;
                     string stageNote = IntegerToString(m_erasSinceBestBalanced) + " eras with no new best selection score (best " +
                                        DoubleToString(m_bestBalancedOos, 1) + "%)";
                     if(m_plateauStage == PLATEAU_STAGE_RESTART || m_plateauStage == PLATEAU_STAGE_ANNEAL)
                       {
                        //--- WARM RESTART: jump eta back to this model's configured starting rate. A
                        //--- plateau needs a bigger step to climb out of its basin, not a smaller one.
                        double etaBefore = eta;
                        eta = m_etaCeiling;
                        //--- The focal-gamma anneal that used to accompany this went with focal loss
                        //--- on 2026-07-31. It was only ever a monotone step toward zero on a second
                        //--- imbalance correction; the warm restart above is and always was the
                        //--- actual escape, so both ladder stages keep their distinct patience
                        //--- thresholds and simply retry the restart.
                        Print(ID + ": PLATEAU stage " + IntegerToString(m_plateauStage) + " - " + stageNote +
                              ". Warm restart: learning rate " + DoubleToString(etaBefore, 6) + "->" + DoubleToString(eta, 6) +
                              ". Best checkpoint is safe - this only changes how the NEXT eras train.");
                       }
                     else
                        if(m_plateauStage >= PLATEAU_STAGE_DEPLOY)
                          {
                           //--- Exhausted: both escapes were tried and neither found a better model, so
                           //--- this IS the best this configuration reaches. The deploy itself happens in
                           //--- the era-cap/plateau branch at the TOP of the next era, which reuses the
                           //--- proven "stop + mark complete -> FinalizeTrainRun restores and deploys the
                           //--- best checkpoint" path rather than duplicating it here.
                           //--- Safety: only ever auto-deploys a checkpoint that CLEARED the per-class
                           //--- recall floor (m_bestPassedRecall). If nothing ever did, there is no model
                           //--- worth deploying - so the ladder resets and keeps trying instead, leaving
                           //--- the era cap as the ultimate backstop. That is what stops "train to the
                           //--- best possible result" from degenerating into "deploy a Neutral collapse".
                           if(m_bestPassedRecall && m_haveOosCheckpoint)
                              Print(ID + ": PLATEAU stage " + IntegerToString(PLATEAU_STAGE_DEPLOY) + " - " + stageNote +
                                    " across " + IntegerToString(PLATEAU_STAGE_DEPLOY - 1) + " warm restarts. Training has converged on what this"
                                    + " configuration can reach - deploying the best checkpoint (dir-precision "
                                    + DoubleToString(m_bestBalancedOos, 1) + "%, blended " + DoubleToString(m_bestOosForecast, 1) + "%).");
                           else
                              {
                               Print(ID + ": PLATEAU stage " + IntegerToString(PLATEAU_STAGE_DEPLOY) + " - " + stageNote +
                                     ", but no checkpoint has ever cleared the deployability floor (directional calls on" +
                                     " at least a quarter as many bars as actually swing, at a precision above that base rate), so there is nothing safe to"
                                     + " deploy. Restarting the plateau ladder and continuing to train rather than deploying a"
                                     + " one-class model; the " + IntegerToString(m_maxErasPerRun) + "-era cap remains the backstop.");
                               m_erasSinceBestBalanced = 0;
                               m_plateauStage = 0;
                              }
                          }
                    }
                 }
               m_oosWindow.Add(dOosForecast);
               while(m_oosWindow.Total() > STABILITY_WINDOW)
                  m_oosWindow.Delete(0);
               m_oosStable = false;
               if(m_oosWindow.Total() >= STABILITY_WINDOW)
                 {
                  double oosMin = m_oosWindow.At(0), oosMax = m_oosWindow.At(0);
                  for(int w = 1; w < m_oosWindow.Total(); w++)
                    {
                     oosMin = MathMin(oosMin, m_oosWindow.At(w));
                     oosMax = MathMax(oosMax, m_oosWindow.At(w));
                    }
                  m_oosStable = (oosMax - oosMin) <= STABILITY_TOLERANCE;
                 }
               // The dError<0.1 RMS-error floor is meaningful for the single-neuron regression head
               // (m_outputNeuronsCount==1), where it's the only convergence signal available. For the
               // 3-neuron one-hot classification head it's redundant with, and far stricter than,
               // dOosForecast/directionalRecallOK: reaching RMS error 0.1 across 3 one-hot targets
               // needs every output neuron within ~0.17 of its target on average, i.e. near-perfect
               // confident calibration on EVERY bar, not just correct argmax calls - unreachable in
               // practice under normal market label noise, so classification runs would oscillate
               // forever (era after era hitting good OOS accuracy and passing recall, but never
               // satisfying this) without this carve-out.
               bool errorGateOK = (m_outputNeuronsCount == 3) ? true : (dError < 0.1);
               // Convergence (unlike isBetterEra's ranking) FINALIZES the model, so both directional
               // classes must have actually been MEASURED this era. An n/a (-1, thin-sample) Buy or
               // Sell recall passing directionalRecallOK is deliberate for ranking (early thin
               // windows shouldn't deadlock "best" tracking), but letting it pass HERE converges on
               // a window that contained no directional bars to disprove the model. Observed
               // 2026-07-19: a mid-run label-cache wipe relabeled the whole window Neutral,
               // "accuracy" hit 84.9% with Buy/Sell recall both n/a - without this gate a Neutral-only
               // model finalizes as a certified success.
               bool directionalRecallMeasured = (m_outputNeuronsCount != 3) || (buyRecallPct >= 0 && sellRecallPct >= 0);
               //--- VALIDITY of this era's model, no longer "did it hit a target accuracy". The absolute
               //--- OOS-accuracy target (the old MinWR input) is gone: an accuracy number typed in ahead of
               //--- time is either unreachable for the symbol/timeframe - in which case the run never
               //--- converges and burns to the era cap - or set low enough to stop a run that was still
               //--- improving. Neither is what "train to the best result" means. Quality is now enforced by
               //--- WHICH era gets deployed (balanced-accuracy checkpoint ranking + this per-class recall
               //--- floor) and WHEN a run ends (the plateau ladder), not by an accuracy threshold. Note the
               //--- recall floor deliberately stays: it is not a performance target but the anti-collapse
               //--- gate that makes auto-deploy safe.
               m_objectiveMet = errorGateOK && directionalRecallOK && directionalRecallMeasured;
              }
            // Only mark the persisted model "complete" once it actually converged this era -
            // an interruption (stop) or an ordinary in-progress era must stay flagged incomplete
            // so a restart resumes training instead of quietly treating a partial run as done.
            // Convergence = "the plateau ladder is exhausted AND there is a recall-passing checkpoint
            // to deploy" - the exact same condition the deploy branch beside the era-cap check uses, so
            // the flag written into the .nnw here can never disagree with the decision to stop. While a
            // run is still improving (or still has an escape stage left to try) this stays false and the
            // per-era save correctly records an in-progress run. Previously this was
            // (m_objectiveMet && m_oosStable), which needed the removed absolute accuracy target to mean
            // anything: with that target gone m_oosStable alone - just 3 eras inside a 2pp band, which
            // is true constantly - would have converged the run at the first flat spot.
            m_trainingComplete = (m_plateauStage >= PLATEAU_STAGE_DEPLOY) && m_bestPassedRecall && m_haveOosCheckpoint;
            double currentIndicatorParams[];
            m_indicatorTuner.Flatten(currentIndicatorParams);
            if(!Net.Save(m_activeFileName + ".nnw", dError, dUndefine, dForecast, dtStudied, m_activeFileCommon, m_eraCount, m_trainingComplete, currentIndicatorParams))
               Print(__FUNCTION__ + ": ERROR - era-end Net.Save failed for " + m_activeFileName + ".nnw (era " + IntegerToString(m_eraCount) + "). Training continues but this era's checkpoint was NOT persisted - a crash/restart now would resume from an older era.");
            if(!SaveModelStats(m_activeFileName, m_activeFileCommon)) // keep calibration state paired with the just-saved weights
               Print(__FUNCTION__ + ": ERROR - SaveModelStats failed for " + m_activeFileName + " (era " + IntegerToString(m_eraCount) + "). Calibration/online-learning state not persisted this era.");
            SaveShadowNet(currentIndicatorParams);
           }
        }
      if(shouldLogProgress)
        {
         string recallInfo = (logBuyRecallPct < 0 && logSellRecallPct < 0 && logNeutralRecallPct < 0) ? "" :
            (" | OOS recall Buy:" + (logBuyRecallPct < 0 ? "n/a" : IntegerToString(logBuyRecallPct) + "%") +
             " Sell:" + (logSellRecallPct < 0 ? "n/a" : IntegerToString(logSellRecallPct) + "%") +
             " Neutral:" + (logNeutralRecallPct < 0 ? "n/a" : IntegerToString(logNeutralRecallPct) + "%") +
             " (need >=" + IntegerToString(m_minDirectionalRecallPct) + "% each)");
         //--- Balanced accuracy = the checkpoint-selection metric (see m_bestBalancedOos). Shown so the
         //--- number the deployed model is actually chosen on is visible next to the recalls it averages.
         //--- Balanced accuracy is retained as a DIAGNOSTIC only - selection ranks on directional
         //--- precision now (see the SELECTION METRIC note). Both are shown so a run where they
         //--- disagree - the signature of an over-calling model - is visible at a glance.
         string balancedInfo = (logBalancedAccPct < 0) ? "" : (" | OOS balanced acc " + IntegerToString(logBalancedAccPct) + "% (diagnostic)");
         string selectionInfo = (logDirPrecPct < 0) ? " | SELECT: no directional calls" :
            (" | SELECT dir-precision " + IntegerToString(logDirPrecPct) + "% on " +
             IntegerToString(logCoveragePct) + "% of bars" +
             (logChancePrecPct >= 0
              ? " (chance " + IntegerToString(logChancePrecPct) + "%, edge " +
                (logDirPrecPct - logChancePrecPct >= 0 ? "+" : "") +
                IntegerToString(logDirPrecPct - logChancePrecPct) + "pp)"
              : ""));
         // See logBuyPredPct's declaration comment for why this is worth logging alongside recall -
         // it's what tells apart a suppressed/dead output (predicted rate stuck at 0%) from a
         // miscalibrated boundary (predicted rate healthy, precision poor), which look identical from
         // recall alone.
         string predictedInfo = (logBuyPredPct < 0 && logSellPredPct < 0) ? "" :
            (" | OOS calls Buy:" + (logBuyPredPct < 0 ? "n/a" : IntegerToString(logBuyPredPct) + "%") +
             " (win rate " + (logBuyPrecPct < 0 ? "n/a" : IntegerToString(logBuyPrecPct) + "%") + ")" +
             " Sell:" + (logSellPredPct < 0 ? "n/a" : IntegerToString(logSellPredPct) + "%") +
             " (win rate " + (logSellPrecPct < 0 ? "n/a" : IntegerToString(logSellPrecPct) + "%") + ")");
         //--- Live-fired precision: the number that actually predicts forward-trading performance - only
         //--- the directional calls that cleared the confidence floor under the live/prior-corrected rule
         //--- (see AdjustedSignalFromSoftmax). Count in parentheses = how many bars the model would have
         //--- traded this era. "0" fires = the calibration is (this era) suppressing all directional trades.
         string liveInfo = (m_lastBuyFired <= 0 && m_lastSellFired <= 0) ? " | live fires 0 this era" :
            (" | live win rate Buy:" + (logBuyFiredPrecPct < 0 ? "n/a" : IntegerToString(logBuyFiredPrecPct) + "%") +
             " (" + IntegerToString(m_lastBuyFired) + ")" +
             " Sell:" + (logSellFiredPrecPct < 0 ? "n/a" : IntegerToString(logSellFiredPrecPct) + "%") +
             " (" + IntegerToString(m_lastSellFired) + ")");
         //--- Precision BY CONFIDENCE TIER, and cumulatively from each tier upward - the two numbers a
         //--- decision about Min_Vote_Open actually needs. The per-tier figure says whether confidence is
         //--- calibrated to correctness at all (it should rise T0->T3; if it does not, raising the floor
         //--- buys nothing and the finding is that the head's confidence is uninformative). The ">=Tn"
         //--- figure is what you would ACTUALLY get, because a floor keeps every tier at or above it, and
         //--- it comes with the fire count so the coverage cost of raising the floor is visible in the
         //--- same line. Tier weights are 25/50/75/100, so for an AI-only config the input maps straight
         //--- across: Min_Vote_Open 50 = ">=T1", 75 = ">=T2", 100 = ">=T3".
         string tierInfo = "";
         int tierFiredTotal = 0;
         for(int ti = 0; ti < 4; ti++)
            tierFiredTotal += m_oosTierFired[ti];
         if(tierFiredTotal > 0)
           {
            tierInfo = " | tier prec";
            for(int ti = 0; ti < 4; ti++)
              {
               int cumFired = 0, cumHits = 0;
               for(int tj = ti; tj < 4; tj++)
                 {
                  cumFired += m_oosTierFired[tj];
                  cumHits  += m_oosTierHits[tj];
                 }
               tierInfo += " T" + IntegerToString(ti) + ":" +
                           (m_oosTierFired[ti] > 0
                            ? IntegerToString((int)MathRound(100.0 * m_oosTierHits[ti] / m_oosTierFired[ti])) + "%"
                            : "n/a") +
                           "(" + IntegerToString(m_oosTierFired[ti]) + ")" +
                           (cumFired > 0
                            ? "[>=" + IntegerToString((int)MathRound(100.0 * cumHits / cumFired)) + "%/" +
                              IntegerToString(cumFired) + "]"
                            : "");
              }
           }
         // Per-layer weight movement. Pairs with rawOutInfo below: a collapsed constant-classifier state
         // has two very different causes, and only this tells them apart. If every layer moves and the
         // output still collapses, the architecture or the objective is at fault; if one stage sits at
         // ~0.000% era after era while the others move, that stage is receiving no gradient and no amount
         // of retraining or hyperparameter work will help. See CNet::LayerLearningReport.
         string layerInfo = (CheckPointer(Net) == POINTER_INVALID) ? "" :
                            (" | dW/W" + Net.LayerLearningReport());
         // Raw-output saturation diagnostic - see m_oosOutMin's declaration comment. Spread ~0 with
         // all six min/max values pinned together = the collapsed constant-classifier state.
         string rawOutInfo = (m_oosOutCount <= 0) ? "" :
            StringFormat(" | OOS raw out B:%.3f..%.3f S:%.3f..%.3f N:%.3f..%.3f spread avg %.4f",
                         m_oosOutMin[0], m_oosOutMax[0], m_oosOutMin[1], m_oosOutMax[1],
                         m_oosOutMin[2], m_oosOutMax[2], m_oosOutSpreadSum / m_oosOutCount);
         //--- No "(target X%)" any more - there is no absolute accuracy target. What replaces it as the
         //--- progress indicator is the plateau counter: how many eras since the last new best, and how
         //--- close that is to ending the run (see the PLATEAU_* ladder).
         string plateauInfo = (m_bestBalancedOos < 0) ? "" :
            (" | best bal " + DoubleToString(m_bestBalancedOos, 1) + "%, " + IntegerToString(m_erasSinceBestBalanced) +
             " eras since (stage " + IntegerToString(m_plateauStage) + "/" + IntegerToString(PLATEAU_STAGE_DEPLOY) + ")");
         //--- Lifetime IS/OOS directional accuracy. The panel now shows the out-of-sample half alone (see
         //--- ComputeCompoundedAccuracyLine - the in-sample figure grades the model on bars it trained on,
         //--- so it always reads higher than anything forward trading will deliver and does not belong on
         //--- a product's face). The GAP between the two is still the over-fitting read, so it survives
         //--- here, once per era, behind the compile-time DebuggingMode constant.
         string lifetimeInfo = (!DebuggingMode || (m_cumIsTotal <= 0 && m_cumOosTotal <= 0)) ? "" :
            (" | lifetime dir acc IS " + (m_cumIsTotal > 0 ? IntegerToString((int)MathRound(m_cumIsCorrect * 100.0 / m_cumIsTotal)) + "%" : "n/a") +
             " OOS " + (m_cumOosTotal > 0 ? IntegerToString((int)MathRound(m_cumOosCorrect * 100.0 / m_cumOosTotal)) + "%" : "n/a") +
             " over " + IntegerToString(m_cumIsTotal + m_cumOosTotal) + " calls");
         Print(ID + ": training in progress - era " + IntegerToString(m_eraCount) + ", OOS accuracy " + DoubleToString(dOosForecast, 1) + "%, IS error " + DoubleToString(dError, 2) + recallInfo + balancedInfo + selectionInfo + predictedInfo + liveInfo + tierInfo + plateauInfo + lifetimeInfo + rawOutInfo + layerInfo);
         // Forced (unthrottled) panel refresh, right here alongside the console line above, using this
         // era's own just-finalized m_eraCount/dOosForecast - see UpdateTrainingStatusLabel's
         // declaration comment for why this can't just rely on the next throttled bar-scan call to
         // catch up (it would, but a full era later than the console already reported it).
         UpdateTrainingStatusLabel("Era complete", m_lastDisplayNeuron0, m_lastDisplayNeuron1, m_lastDisplayNeuron2, m_lastDisplaySignal, true);
        }
      //--- Genuine convergence THIS era (not a stale m_trainingComplete carried over from a previous
      //--- run) - (re)start the evaluation-only continual-learning OOS walk. Always rebuilt fresh from
      //--- the just-converged weights; never resumes a stale walk from a superseded model.
      //--- m_trainingComplete is the plateau ladder's verdict now (see where it is assigned): "stopped
      //--- improving after both escape attempts, and there is a recall-passing checkpoint to deploy".
      //--- It replaces the old (m_objectiveMet && m_oosStable) test, which depended on the removed
      //--- absolute accuracy target to mean anything - without it, m_oosStable alone (3 eras inside a 2pp
      //--- band) would have declared convergence at the first flat spot in every run.
      if(!stop && m_trainingComplete)
        {
         Print(ID + ": training CONVERGED at era " + IntegerToString(m_eraCount) + " - this is the best this configuration reached: dir-precision " +
               DoubleToString(m_bestBalancedOos, 1) + "%, blended OOS " + DoubleToString(dOosForecast, 1) + "%, IS error " + DoubleToString(dError, 2) +
               ". No new best for " + IntegerToString(m_erasSinceBestBalanced) + " eras across " +
               IntegerToString(PLATEAU_STAGE_DEPLOY - 1) + " learning-rate warm restarts." +
               " Weights saved, switching to live inference.");
         StartOosContinualSimulation(bars, oosCutoff);
        }
      if(stop || m_trainingComplete)
         FinalizeTrainRun();
      //--- else: this era is done but the run continues - the next Train() call (re-triggered via
      //--- ScheduleTrainingIfNeeded()'s custom event, same mechanism as always) starts the next era
      //--- fresh, since m_eraResumePending is false while m_trainRunActive stays true
      //--- Save this model's own learning-rate trajectory back out of the shared global before
      //--- returning - see m_modelEta's declaration comment. Covers every path that reaches here
      //--- (natural era completion, whether or not the run itself just finalized).
      m_modelEta = eta;
  }
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
//| Ends the current Train() run: restores the best-scoring era's    |
//| checkpointed weights (if any beat the era the loop happened to   |
//| end on), persists final state, and clears the resumable-run      |
//| flags. Called both from Train() itself (natural stop/converge)   |
//| and from StopTraining() (a mid-chunk Stop click won't get         |
//| another "New Bar" event to resume into, since                    |
//| ScheduleTrainingIfNeeded() refuses to schedule while              |
//| m_trainingStopRequested is set, so it must finalize synchronously |
//| there instead of being left dangling).                           |
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
//| Era-cap decision: keep training (true) or deploy best + stop      |
//| (false). Live chart -> operator dialog; headless -> stop.         |
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
bool CExpertSignalAIBase::PromptContinuePastEraCap(double bestOos)
  {
   //--- No GUI in the Strategy Tester/optimizer - MessageBox() is unavailable there and would just
   //--- stall a headless run, so deploy the best checkpoint found so far and stop (the safe default).
   if(MQLInfoInteger(MQL_TESTER) || MQLInfoInteger(MQL_OPTIMIZATION) || MQLInfoInteger(MQL_FORWARD))
      return false;
   //--- Reaching this cap is now the UNUSUAL outcome: a run normally ends itself when the plateau ladder
   //--- runs out of escapes (see the PLATEAU_* constants), which is a statement about the run having
   //--- stopped improving rather than about any accuracy number. So the interesting question here is why
   //--- the ladder had not finished yet - either the run was still finding new bests (just needs more
   //--- eras), or nothing has ever cleared the per-class recall floor, which blocks auto-deploy on
   //--- purpose so a one-class model can never ship. Spell out which.
   bool recallMet = (m_lastBuyRecallPct < 0 || m_lastBuyRecallPct >= m_minDirectionalRecallPct) &&
                    (m_lastSellRecallPct < 0 || m_lastSellRecallPct >= m_minDirectionalRecallPct);
   string neutralNote = (m_priorNeutral > 0.0)
                        ? ("inflated by the ~" + IntegerToString((int)MathRound(m_priorNeutral * 100.0)) + "% Neutral base rate")
                        : "inflated by the dominant Neutral class";
   string reasons = "";
   if(!m_bestPassedRecall)
      reasons += "  - No era has ever cleared the per-class recall floor, so there is no model safe to\n" +
                 "    auto-deploy yet (a model that ignores Buy or Sell must never ship)\n";
   else
      reasons += "  - Still improving: " + IntegerToString(m_erasSinceBestBalanced) + " eras since the last new best, plateau stage " +
                 IntegerToString(m_plateauStage) + " of " + IntegerToString(PLATEAU_STAGE_DEPLOY) + " (the run ends itself at stage " +
                 IntegerToString(PLATEAU_STAGE_DEPLOY) + ")\n";
   if(!recallMet)
      reasons += "  - Latest era's per-class recall below the floor: Buy " +
                 (m_lastBuyRecallPct < 0 ? "n/a" : IntegerToString(m_lastBuyRecallPct) + "%") + " / Sell " +
                 (m_lastSellRecallPct < 0 ? "n/a" : IntegerToString(m_lastSellRecallPct) + "%") +
                 " (need >=" + IntegerToString(m_minDirectionalRecallPct) + "% each)\n";
   if(!m_objectiveMet)
      reasons += "  - The latest era did not produce a valid model (recall floor not met/not measured)\n";
   string balancedStr = (m_bestBalancedOos > 0.0)
                        ? ("\nBest directional precision, coverage-weighted (the metric the deployed\ncheckpoint is chosen on): " + DoubleToString(m_bestBalancedOos, 1) +
                           "%\nBest blended OOS accuracy: " + DoubleToString(bestOos, 1) + "% (" + neutralNote + ")\n")
                        : "";
   string msg = ID + ": training reached the " + IntegerToString(m_maxErasPerRun) +
                "-era cap before it finished on its own.\n\n" +
                "Training now runs until it stops improving, then deploys its best model. Status:\n" +
                reasons +
                balancedStr +
                "\nContinue training?\n\n" +
                "Yes  = keep training for another " + IntegerToString(m_maxErasPerRun) + " eras\n" +
                "No   = deploy the best checkpoint so far and stop training";
   int res = MessageBox(msg, "Warrior EA - training", MB_YESNO | MB_ICONQUESTION);
   return (res == IDYES);
  }
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
//| See the declaration comment - the single deploy-persistence path. |
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
void CExpertSignalAIBase::PersistDeployedModel(void)
  {
   if(CheckPointer(Net) == POINTER_INVALID)
      return;
   double currentIndicatorParams[];
   m_indicatorTuner.Flatten(currentIndicatorParams);
   if(!Net.Save(m_activeFileName + ".nnw", dError, dUndefine, dForecast, dtStudied, m_activeFileCommon, m_eraCount, m_trainingComplete, currentIndicatorParams))
      Print(__FUNCTION__ + ": ERROR - Net.Save failed for " + m_activeFileName + ".nnw. The deployed model was NOT persisted to disk.");
   //--- Deploy-time gate: does this model's pure-MQL5 forward pass match the backend? If so, an
   //--- inference-only backtest can run DLL-free (see ValidateCpuInference / CNet::SetCpuInference).
   //--- Persisted into the .stats written next. Chart-only; safe-false everywhere else.
   m_mqlInferenceValidated = ValidateCpuInference();
   if(!SaveModelStats(m_activeFileName, m_activeFileCommon)) // keep calibration state paired with the just-saved weights
      Print(__FUNCTION__ + ": ERROR - SaveModelStats failed for " + m_activeFileName + ". Calibration state not persisted.");
   SaveShadowNet(currentIndicatorParams);
  }
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
void CExpertSignalAIBase::FinalizeTrainRun(void)
  {
   //--- deploy the most stable/best-scoring era's weights rather than whatever the run happened to
   //--- end on (which may reflect drift after the objective was first hit, or an aborted run). Restore
   //--- is now the in-MEMORY snapshot (CNet::RestoreWeights) - see CaptureWeights' note for why the old
   //--- file-based restore couldn't work on the CPU-DLL backend.
   if(m_haveOosCheckpoint)
     {
      if(Net.RestoreWeights())
        {
         dOosForecast = m_bestOosForecast;
         RefreshLatestSignal();
         //--- NOT during shutdown. RestoreWeights() above is an in-MEMORY swap, so the best checkpoint is
         //--- already the live net by this line - and OnDeinit's PersistWeightsOnShutdown() is about to
         //--- write exactly those weights anyway. Persisting here too means TWO full ~1MB model writes per
         //--- signal on the shutdown path, ahead of the chart cleanup, which is what put OnDeinit over
         //--- MetaTrader's budget: measured 4.46 s to "Abnormal termination" on 2026-08-01, with the chart
         //--- cleanup completing 0.2 s AFTER the kill. Nothing is lost by skipping it; the same bytes reach
         //--- the same file one call later.
         if(!m_shutdownInProgress)
            PersistDeployedModel();
        }
     }
   //--- Clean up any legacy on-disk checkpoint from an older (file-based) build so it can't linger.
   int checkpointFlags = m_activeFileCommon ? FILE_COMMON : 0;
   if(FileIsExist(m_activeFileName + "_ckpt.tmp", checkpointFlags))
      FileDelete(m_activeFileName + "_ckpt.tmp", checkpointFlags);
   //--- (dtStudied used to be held back while scoring a throwaway candidate - that marker belongs
   //--- to the DEPLOYED model's "studied up to" state; a candidate eval must leave it untouched. The
   //--- checkpoint block above is already inert in eval mode (m_haveOosCheckpoint stays false).
   if(m_eraCount > 0)
      dtStudied = m_lastBarTime;
   m_trainRunActive = false;
   m_eraResumePending = false;
   m_haveOosCheckpoint = false;
   //--- Persist the arrows now drawn on the chart so a deploy/stop survives a later re-add/recompile
   //--- without a retrain (durable even if the terminal never gets a clean OnDeinit).
   //--- The prune is suppressed when a STOP is in flight, because that means StopTraining() called us and
   //--- ShutdownChartCleanup() is about to bulk-purge every arrow anyway. Without this, removing a chart
   //--- MID-ERA takes the expensive path twice: once here and once in the cleanup that follows, both
   //--- before anything has been cleared. Same defect as the shutdown prune, one call site earlier - see
   //--- the prune block in SaveChartSignals() for the measurement.
   SaveChartSignals(!m_trainingStopRequested);
  }
#endif // WARRIOR_AIBASE_TRAINING_MQH