forked from animatedread/Warrior_EA
| Filename | Latest commit message | Latest commit date |
|---|---|---|
afe1038d11
1. THE POOL FIX WAS LANDING ON A TOPOLOGY THAT COULD NOT SEE IT. ComputeFirstLayerWidth budgets against EstimatedInSampleBars, which counts this chart's own bars PLUS the training pool. On a COLD fleet start every chart derives and pins its topology BEFORE any chart has published a pool file - measured on the 18:13 start, model creation at 18:13:21 against a first publish at 18:13:48. All six sized as if training alone, wrote that into .cfg, and adopted it back on every later start even with the pool full. SP500 ran a first layer floored to 16 while adopting 30229 peer rows. Adopt-don't-compare exists to protect weights shaped by those sizes. It was also running for a model with NO .nnw, where there is nothing to protect and the .cfg is just a record of one unlucky moment. The four derived sizes are now re-measured when no weights exist. Safe on all three counts that matter: free (nothing to discard), cannot loop (once weights exist the .cfg is authoritative again), and cannot fragment the pool - the derived width is NOT in BuildModelFingerprint, which keys only on the FEATURE layout. Verified: field 2 of the fingerprint is LEGACY_HISTORY_BARS_SLOT, not the first-layer width. TO TAKE EFFECT the weights must be wiped while the TrainPool is KEPT - the census has to be non-empty at derivation time. A full wipe empties the pool and reproduces the original condition exactly. 2. THE KEEP-SCREEN LATCHED ON AN UNDERPOWERED SAMPLE. MI_MIN_SAMPLES is a floor for "can this be computed", and it was being used as the bar for "is this answer final". The screen fired on the first era clearing 200 rows and latched, measuring at 202-773 samples where a warm chart gives ~2065. Columns kept then tracked SAMPLE SIZE rather than information - EURUSD kept 0 of 49 at n=202, SP500 kept 15 at n=773, and the ordering across all six charts was very nearly monotone in n. A thin sample is still measured and printed, but it no longer closes the question: below MI_GOOD_SAMPLE_FRACTION of the target the result is labelled underpowered and a later era supersedes it, bounded by the same attempt budget. An underpowered screen that latches is worse than one that waits, because it looks like a result. Build tag -> fleet-pool-v2. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
| .. | ||
| AutoTune.mqh | ||
| Features.mqh | ||
| FeatureScreen.mqh | ||
| Inference.mqh | ||
| Labels.mqh | ||
| Lifecycle.mqh | ||
| Topology.mqh | ||
| Training.mqh | ||