Wyckoff 2.0 (Ruben Villahermosa Chaves, 2021) - pages 1-52 digest

Pp1-7 title/copyright/TOC. TOC of the rest of the book (orientation): Part 1 advanced concepts; Part 2 FAQ; Part 3 trading ecosystem (actors, algo/HFT, OTC, dark pools, adaptive markets); Part 4 importance of volume (Auction Market Theory); Part 5 Volume Profile (types P/b, VPOC migration, value-area principles: range, reversion, continuation, failed reversion); Part 6 Order Flow (footprint, imbalances, reversal/continuation models); Part 7 Wyckoff 2.0 operational scheme (context, zones, scenarios, entry/SL/TP); Part 8 case studies. Book assumes the author's first book ("La Metodologia Wyckoff en Profundidad") is mastered (phases A-E, events, three laws are NOT re-explained). Philosophy (p9): author adapts Wyckoff to modern markets, enriching it with Volume Profile and Order Flow; invariant = law of supply and demand. Non-purist.

1. CONCEPTS

Labels (Les etiquettes) (p10-12): labelling is not robotic; no two structures identical. What matters is the action as a whole: the market objectively STOPPED a trend (change of character, trend -> sideways), even if the 4 Phase-A stopping events (PS/SC/AR/ST; "Climax, Reaction, Test") cannot be identified. Underlying logic: to go up there must first be accumulation, to go down distribution; the form is not decisive. Key objective feature in an unconventional accumulation: a level (Creek) where price repeatedly rejected and was finally broken and held above. Goal: infer who is probably taking control from the traces, not label every move.
Price vs volume (p13-14): price is more relevant than volume. Intraday volume is misleading depending on session time (e.g. ES: huge volume at US cash open RTH vs thin electronic hours ETH; also bumps at midday lull and before the final stretch of the day). Low volume overnight = absence of traders, not lack of interest. Price already contains all executed orders and is time-of-day independent. Volume also distorted by OTC and Dark Pools (treated later).
Tick chart (p16): new candle after N trades (ticks); N must be tuned per market; ignores contracts per trade; candle volumes similar but with subtle differences.
Volume chart (p17): new candle after N contracts/shares/units traded regardless of number of trades. Downside: volume-analysis techniques unusable (every bar has same volume).
Range chart (p18): price-based; every bar same size regardless of time; new bar when price moves N ticks either direction (range 15 = 15 ticks); more bars in high volatility. All three remove the time variable and reduce noise (useful when market spans different activity environments).
Failed accumulation / failed distribution (structure echouee, rupture de continuite) (p19-21): all traces point one way (e.g. buyers control, potential Spring, authentic bullish breakout by price and volume) but at the moment of truth (test after breakout, BUEC) the opposite side acts more aggressively and the imbalance flips. A failed accumulation is always actually a distribution (and vice versa), so author says the term is better avoided but it teaches that different trader types act by timeframe. Why it happens: Spring buyers may be very short-term and close at a liquidity zone (range top or mid), losing bullish momentum; or longer-term bigger traders short into the rally; large players also lose money (Al Brooks: every tick is a big buyer vs a big seller).
- Failed distribution mirror: sellers' traces, potential Upthrust, genuine bearish breakout, then at the post-breakout test aggressive buying turns structure into accumulation.
The shake (le choc; shakeout event: Spring/Upthrust) (p21): the most decisive action in the market; we are always biased in its favour. If other traces agree, trade in direction of the last shake: longs after potential Spring, shorts after potential Upthrust. Edge = trade in favour of the LAST imbalance.
Structural failure (defaillance structurale) (p23-25): identify the structure price has validated by successful touches of two supply/demand zones (more touches = more confidence). Price expected to keep traversing extreme to extreme. If price reverses BEFORE reaching the opposite zone, that is a structural failure, which adds force to the reversal scenario. LPS and LPSY are structural failures (price blocked in trying to go after the shake event).
- Weakness: after validating a structure repeatedly, price fails to reach the structure's top => buyers no longer in control, sellers emerging.
- Strength: price (making lower highs/lower lows inside bounds) fails to reach the structure's bottom after testing the top => buyers blocked the decline. If it also shakes out a relevant previous low = potential Spring with extra underlying strength. Neither implies immediate reversal; just one more element for context.
Shortening of the Thrust (SOT) (Raccourcissement de la poussee) (p26-27): Wyckoff analytic tool for momentum loss/exhaustion. Each new extreme travels a shorter distance than the previous. Uptrend: each new high travels less = demand deteriorating, possible bearish reversal. Downtrend: each new low travels less = supply deteriorating, possible bullish reversal. Also visible in individual bars/successive bars progressing less and less.
Sloped structures (structures a pente) (p30-32): same events/phases as horizontal ones ("rotate the image"); only market condition differs. Upsloping = underlying strength (buyers in control); downsloping = weakness (sellers). Four types: upsloping accumulation (greatest strength), downsloping accumulation (greatest weakness among accumulations), downsloping distribution (greatest weakness), upsloping distribution (initial strength, ends with seller aggression).
Unusual schemes (schemas inhabituels) (p44-46): ranges not horizontal/sloped, incl. classic chart patterns (H&S, wedges, triangles, V reversals). Author argues not to force Wyckoff labels on them.
Lines (p48): lines/channels/trendlines show who controls the market: rising channel = buyers; falling channel = sellers; horizontal repeated reversals = balance.
Scenario/label change (p51-52): labels depend on subsequent action; weight latest information most; second most important is what immediately precedes.

2. RULES

R1 (p10-12,45-46) Do not discard an asset because Phase-A events (SC/AR/ST) cannot be labelled; sufficient condition = trend objectively stopped + change of character to sideways -> a cause is being built. Do not demand textbook phase proportionality (e.g. Phase B longer than A and C) in real time (p46).
R2 (p14) Intraday: compare price and volume against same-session-type references (ETH vs RTH); or use the daily chart (covers both sessions, but implies a total change of trading style).
R3 (p15-18) Tick/volume/range charts remove time variable; tune N per market by testing; volume charts block volume analysis.
R4 (p20-21) Failed-structure diagnosis requires ALL traces in one direction and failure at the decisive test after breakout (BUEC/LPSY test) with imbalance flipping. Failed accumulation = Spring + genuine breakout + price cannot continue up at BUEC, sellers gain imbalance.
R5 (p21) Trade in the direction of the last shake: longs after potential Spring, shorts after potential Upthrust, if remaining traces agree.
R6 (p22) Context beats extremes-only trading: author does not trade only Spring/Upthrust at extremes; e.g. a distribution with distributive features then positioned for potential bearish breakout and potential Spring: he favours the bearish breakout (latent imbalance), whereas a shake-only trader does the opposite. Market usually continues in the latent imbalance direction.
R7 (p23) Structural failure: validated structure + reversal before reaching opposite zone = added force toward the reversal.
R8 (p25) Strength failure + shakeout of relevant prior low = Spring with more underlying strength (convergence).
R9 (p26-27) SOT: needs minimum THREE thrusts in trend direction; start looking for shortening on the final thrust after 3 or 4 impulses. Shortening + HIGH volume = Effort/Result divergence (big effort little reward; in bearish case demand appears, bullish case supply appears). Shortening + LOW volume = exhaustion (supply withdrawing in downtrend; buyers withdrawing in uptrend). More than FOUR thrusts with persisting shortening = trend may be too strong to trade against.
R10 (p27) SOT confirmation: strong impulsive move in opposite direction with HIGH volume (intentionality), then wait for a pullback to join the new direction.
R11 (p27) SOT context: price breaking a range top and reversing = potential Upthrust. A buy-SOT after bearish waves when price has just made an up-shake is likely to keep falling: avoid buys, or exit quickly after weak response. Likewise a bearish SOT after a potential Spring: shake sets the directional bias; question the SOT idea. Ideal: SOT coinciding with a trading zone where a counter-trade is sought.
R12 (p28,30-31) Beginners: work horizontal structures almost exclusively. Slope: initially draw the Phase-A range horizontally; if in Phase B price does not respect those extremes and exits, think sloped; connect extremes of Phases A, B, C (draw one extreme, clone line to the other); channel must contain almost all price action; more touches = more strength. Perfect touches not needed; a zone of some width may replace a line. Do not totally discard horizontal levels (price may re-enter original structure).
R13 (p32-34) Upsloping accumulation: HH and HL; buyers do not allow oversold zones. Hard to trade: after each prior high is exceeded it looks like a potential shake that will drop the market, and the potential BUEC looks subjectively expensive - it is still the conservative entry; it is "impulses and pullbacks". Supportive traces: volume diminishing during structure, Weis bullish waves predominating, price unable to pass the High Volume Node/VPOC then breaking it after shakeout, backup (BUEC) at Creek confluent with weekly VWAP.
R14 (p35-37) Downsloping accumulation: LH/LL, new lows travelling decreasing distance (SOT); expect structural failure (price finds support before the bottom); confirmation = strong bullish impulse breaking the downsloping structure, then wait for a bearish pullback to join buyers. Supportive: price reacts to monthly VWAP and stays above it from first Secondary Test; volume decreasing relative to SC; minor SOS after shakeout; LPS above structure VPOC; JAC then Back Up at confluence (weekly VWAP + Value Area High + broken Creek); shakeout + show of strength + structural failure = potential buyer imbalance.
R15 (p38-40) Downsloping distribution: LH/LL in a falling channel; wait for Phase-C test in shake form (UTAD), either top overshoot (overbought) or local shake to a relevant prior high. The more spectacular/exaggerated the shake, the more confidence (more liquidity captured, bigger subsequent impulse). Differs from downsloping accumulation: NO SOT momentum loss and NO structural failure. Expect no LPSY or only shallow (price moves fast); ignore subjective "price already low, shouldn't short"; even if the trade is missed, at least avoid buying. Supportive: high volume throughout Phase A, unusual volume spikes in Phase B, predominant bearish Weis waves, price under High Volume Node, LPSY retest of that node then SOW, retest of structure bottom, continuation. UTAD test occurring at range VPOC meeting range top = ideal short zone.
R16 (p41-43) Upsloping distribution: HH but lower lows evolving to seller aggression; use SOT (new highs but moving away from previous highs: AR, UT, UTAD highs with little movement between), structural failure of weakness (does not reach structure top), UTAD at extreme or at a relevant prior high, climactic volume mid-range (warning, shouldn't appear in accumulation), price trying to leave the composite profile Value Area and being rejected at the UTAD, price settling under the profile VPOC with a large bearish Weis wave = directional bias clear, short idea; LPSY test at confluence of broken structure and VPOC then Phase E. UTAD sweeping all structure highs adds force to the bearish scenario; volume spikes in Phase C, price returns to AR origin.
R17 (p44-46) Do not study/label unusual structures; wait for classic structures (strict events/phases, flexible for market conditions). Labelling past charts is for beginners only.
R18 (p48-50) Lines in isolation never operational unless statistically verified. Use lines to (a) get an extra trace of sentiment, (b) bias directionality. In a rising channel: favour buys; short only after the lines break. Anticipating reversal not recommended; at minimum wait for trendline break. Best locations are the extremes, but touching a line is not by itself a reason to buy. Workflow: 1 identify price dynamic; 2 wait for an extreme to bias direction; 3 look for an accumulation/distribution structure there (often on a lower timeframe, p50). Trend direction does not mean trend-following beats counter-trend; it only identifies path of least resistance.
R19 (p51-52) Continuously update labels/scenarios; scenario only for the NEXT move, never beyond (e.g. in Phase B do not speculate accumulative vs distributive). A potential Spring that does not produce at least a minor SOS should be relabelled a simple test (of weakness) when a new low forms. Roadmap: potential Spring confirmed -> wait bullish breakout (rising price and volume) -> pullback to broken structure (BUEC) -> evaluate trend move out of range.

3. FIGURES

(Described from captions/text only; PNGs not opened. Exact bar/volume values are not in the text.)

p19 Failed accumulation schematic: Preliminary Support, Selling Climax, Automatic Rally, Secondary Test, Spring, Sign of Strength; volume diminishing during structure development, increasing on the breakout; then price fails at top/BUEC and structure turns distributive (OBJ target marks).
p22: example where distributive features dominate and price breaks down rather than springing.
p23-25: structural failure: range with LH/LL bounded by two zones; price turns before touching the opposite zone (weakness: fails to reach top; strength: fails to reach bottom). "?" marks projected targets.
p26-27 SOT: uptrend with 3-4 thrusts each shorter than the last, then reversal; confirming impulse opposite with high volume; second chart shows SOT at range top = potential Upthrust.
p31-32 upsloping accumulation: Phase A stop, ascending highs and lows channel, potential BUEC high on chart, then trend out.
p32-33 BTC upsloping accumulation: steep drop with very high volume, rapid new box a few levels higher, volume decreasing in structure, minor distribution at top acting as UTAD that fails to fall (does not reach channel bottom = structural failure of strength), internal shakeout as Phase-C test, HVN/VPOC above which price cannot pass until after.
p33-34 steep upslope: final stop without climactic volume (Selling Exhaustion), HH/HL succession, volume falling in A and B (absorption), difficulty above HVN, shakeout, SOS bars, Back Up at Creek with weekly VWAP.
p35-37 downsloping accumulation: price respects channel extremes; monthly VWAP reacts; shakeout -> LPS above VPOC -> JAC -> Back Up at Creek+weekly VWAP+VAH -> Phase E. Second example: trades in lower half, volume decays vs SC, shakeout, minor SOS, troughs of A/B/C travel ridiculous distances (SOT), internal shake to prior high with weekly VWAP, failure to test low (LPS), two SOS then Back Up.
p38-40 downsloping distribution: redistribution with high-volume Phase A, B volume spikes, bearish Weis waves, price under HVN, retest = LPSY, SOW, retest of bottom, fall. Second: UTAD at range VPOC and top, no LPSY.
p41-43 upsloping distribution: climactic volume mid-range, SOT among AR/UT/UTAD highs, UTAD rejected at composite Value Area, price under VPOC with big bearish Weis wave, LPSY at broken structure + VPOC, Phase E. Second: UTAD sweeps all highs, steep slope, volume spikes in Phase C, falls to AR origin visiting VPOC twice.
p45-46 FDAX/SP500: unconventional bottoms (structure blocked on lows with ascending highs; SC/AR/ST ambiguous; only the Phase-C shake objective), used to argue labels do not matter.
p50: line/channel context then lower-timeframe accumulation at channel extreme to trade the reversal.
p52: Spring at point 1 with no sign of strength, new low at point 2: relabel as test.

4. WARNINGS

Do not hunt for exact Phase-A labels; may discard valid opportunities (p10). Do not impose theory proportions in real time (p46).
Intraday volume without session context is misleading (p13-14); OTC/dark pools also distort volume.
Volume charts prevent volume analysis (p17).
Failed structures: we cannot know trader horizon or whether larger traders will intervene at the test (p21).
Structural failure signals are not immediate reversal signs (p24-25).
SOT: with >4 thrusts trend may be too strong to counter-trade; avoid SOT counter-trade against a fresh shake (p27).
Sloped structures are hard to trade and subjective; must be visual, not forced (p32,36). Downsloping distribution moves fast; missing the trade is acceptable, buying is not (p39).
Wyckoff labels on chart patterns (H&S, triangles, wedges) not valid operationally; hindsight labelling works for anything (p44).
Lines in isolation have no operational value; do not buy/sell merely because a line is touched; do not anticipate reversals without trendline break (p48-49).
Never keep a scenario permanently; never project beyond the next move (p51-52).

5. OPEN

No quantitative criteria for: "objectively stopped" trend, "very visual" channel, number of touches validating a structure, how short a thrust must be to count as SOT (only 3 minimum / >4 caution), or what counts as high/low volume in SOT.
Structural failure: how far short of the opposite zone, zone width: subjective.
"Potential" Spring/Upthrust and "exaggerated shake" subjective; relabel timing ("at least a minor SOS") undefined in bars.
Slope identification relies on discretionary channel drawing; when to switch from horizontal to sloped is not quantified.
Priority of last shake vs prior-structure traces (R5 vs R6) is judgment when they disagree.
Weis waves, weekly/monthly VWAP confluence and VPOC/HVN/VAH cited as supporting zones without numeric thresholds (defined in later parts).

18 KiB Raw Permalink Blame History